1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison
BGE vs MIC: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit
Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of BGE (Hong Kong BGE Limited) and MIC (Mactor International) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.
Coverage: Institutions licensed across Asia-Pacific and the Middle East
- BGE 6D Score
- 5.0
- MIC 6D Score
- 1.0
- Regulated Licences
- 2 vs 0
- Warning Flags
- 0 vs 0
BGE outranks MIC by +4.0 pts in composite 6D scoring (5.0 vs 1.0)
On supervisory breadth, BGE holds 2 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 2 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas MIC holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 0 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.
6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison
Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).
| Evaluation Dimension | Methodology Weight | BGE | MIC | Score Delta | Dimension Leader |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Composite 6D Score | 100% Composite | 5.0 | 1.0 | +4.0 | BGE |
| Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore) | 30% Weight | 5.0 | 1.0 | +4.0 | BGE |
| Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore) | 20% Weight | 3.0 | 1.0 | +2.0 | BGE |
| User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore) | 20% Weight | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore) | 15% Weight | 5.0 | 1.0 | +4.0 | BGE |
| Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore) | 15% Weight | 5.0 | 1.0 | +4.0 | BGE |
Visual Architecture Benchmark: BGE vs MIC
Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.
Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison
Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.
| Audit Attribute | BGE | MIC |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Legal Name | Hong Kong BGE Limited | Mactor International |
| Source Risk Classification | Risk level not supplied | Risk level not supplied |
| Active Regulated / Total Filings | 2 regulated / 2 total (0 Tier-1) | 0 regulated / 0 total (0 Tier-1) |
| Recorded Certificate Numbers | CR: Not suppliedSFC: Not supplied | None on file |
| Registered Domicile / Address | Unit 2414-2416, 24th Floor, China Merchants Tower, Shun Tak Centre, 168-200 Connaught Road Central, Sheung Wan, Hong Kong | HK |
| Offered Asset Classes & Services | cryptocurrencies, custody, trading | Forex |
| Execution Software & Terminals | Proprietary / Web Platform | Proprietary / Web Platform |
| Supported Client Languages | English | English |
| Warning / Exposure Count | 0 recorded warning(s) | 0 recorded warning(s) |
| Specialized Sub-Page Audits |
Related 1v1 Institutional Comparisons
Compare BGE and MIC against other regulated peers in our institutions licensed across asia-pacific and the middle east slice.
Frequently Asked Questions: BGE vs MIC
Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.
Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: BGE or MIC?
BGE holds more active regulated filings (2 vs 0). Specifically, BGE maintains 2 total recorded filing(s) (CR, SFC) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas MIC maintains 0 recorded filing(s) (none on file) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.
How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between BGE and MIC?
In APAC Capital Brief's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), BGE records an Overall Score of 5.0 (Risk & Licensing: 5.0, Brand: 5.0, Market Influence: 5.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 3.0), compared with MIC at 1.0 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 1.0, Brand: 1.0, Market Influence: 1.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 1.0).
How do BGE and MIC differ in trading platforms and asset classes?
BGE lists cryptocurrencies, custody, trading with execution software [proprietary/web execution], while MIC lists Forex with execution software [proprietary/web execution]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.
Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: BGE or MIC?
BGE carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while MIC carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).
Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.