1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison
CEDRA vs Circle Markets: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit
Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of CEDRA (CEDRA Market invest LTD) and Circle Markets (Circle Markets Limited) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.
Coverage: Institutions licensed across Asia-Pacific and the Middle East
- CEDRA 6D Score
- 2.0
- Circle Markets 6D Score
- 2.0
- Regulated Licences
- 0 vs 0
- Warning Flags
- 0 vs 0
CEDRA and Circle Markets are statistically tied in composite 6D scoring (2.0 vs 2.0)
On supervisory breadth, CEDRA holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 0 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas Circle Markets holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 0 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.
6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison
Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).
| Evaluation Dimension | Methodology Weight | CEDRA | Circle Markets | Score Delta | Dimension Leader |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Composite 6D Score | 100% Composite | 2.0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore) | 30% Weight | 2.0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore) | 20% Weight | 1.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore) | 20% Weight | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore) | 15% Weight | 2.0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore) | 15% Weight | 2.0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
Visual Architecture Benchmark: CEDRA vs Circle Markets
Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.
Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison
Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.
| Audit Attribute | CEDRA | Circle Markets |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Legal Name | CEDRA Market invest LTD | Circle Markets Limited |
| Source Risk Classification | Risk level not supplied | Risk level not supplied |
| Active Regulated / Total Filings | 0 regulated / 0 total (0 Tier-1) | 0 regulated / 0 total (0 Tier-1) |
| Recorded Certificate Numbers | None on file | None on file |
| Registered Domicile / Address | Lot 20, Level 1, Lazenda Commercial Centre Phase 3, Jalan Abdullah, 87000 Federal Territory of Labuan | 1 Bank Street, Warkworth, Warkworth, 0910, New Zealand 1 Bank St, Warkworth New Zealand |
| Offered Asset Classes & Services | Multi-asset financial services | Commodities, Indices, Forex, Stocks, Bonds |
| Execution Software & Terminals | Proprietary / Web Platform | MT4 |
| Supported Client Languages | Arabic, English | English |
| Warning / Exposure Count | 0 recorded warning(s) | 0 recorded warning(s) |
| Specialized Sub-Page Audits |
Related 1v1 Institutional Comparisons
Compare CEDRA and Circle Markets against other regulated peers in our institutions licensed across asia-pacific and the middle east slice.
Frequently Asked Questions: CEDRA vs Circle Markets
Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.
Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: CEDRA or Circle Markets?
Both CEDRA and Circle Markets hold 0 regulated licence record(s) in our dataset. Specifically, CEDRA maintains 0 total recorded filing(s) (none on file) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas Circle Markets maintains 0 recorded filing(s) (none on file) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.
How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between CEDRA and Circle Markets?
In APAC Capital Brief's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), CEDRA records an Overall Score of 2.0 (Risk & Licensing: 2.0, Brand: 2.0, Market Influence: 2.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 1.0), compared with Circle Markets at 2.0 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 2.0, Brand: 2.0, Market Influence: 2.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 1.0).
How do CEDRA and Circle Markets differ in trading platforms and asset classes?
CEDRA lists general financial services with execution software [proprietary/web execution], while Circle Markets lists Commodities, Indices, Forex, Stocks, Bonds with execution software [MT4]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.
Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: CEDRA or Circle Markets?
CEDRA carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while Circle Markets carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).
Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.