1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison
CFD Capital vs Core Starters: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit
Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of CFD Capital (CFD Capital Limited) and Core Starters (Core Starters) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.
Coverage: Institutions licensed across Asia-Pacific and the Middle East
- CFD Capital 6D Score
- 2.0
- Core Starters 6D Score
- 2.0
- Regulated Licences
- 0 vs 0
- Warning Flags
- 0 vs 0
CFD Capital and Core Starters are statistically tied in composite 6D scoring (2.0 vs 2.0)
On supervisory breadth, CFD Capital holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 0 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas Core Starters holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 0 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.
6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison
Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).
| Evaluation Dimension | Methodology Weight | CFD Capital | Core Starters | Score Delta | Dimension Leader |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Composite 6D Score | 100% Composite | 2.0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore) | 30% Weight | 2.0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore) | 20% Weight | 1.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore) | 20% Weight | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore) | 15% Weight | 2.0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore) | 15% Weight | 2.0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
Visual Architecture Benchmark: CFD Capital vs Core Starters
Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.
Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison
Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.
| Audit Attribute | CFD Capital | Core Starters |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Legal Name | CFD Capital Limited | Core Starters |
| Source Risk Classification | Risk level not supplied | Risk level not supplied |
| Active Regulated / Total Filings | 0 regulated / 0 total (0 Tier-1) | 0 regulated / 0 total (0 Tier-1) |
| Recorded Certificate Numbers | None on file | None on file |
| Registered Domicile / Address | Morgan Tower, 22nd Floor, Street Koh Pich, Tonle Bassac, Chamkarmorn, Phnom Penh, Cambodia. Room 508, Golden Tower, Street 215, Sangkat Veal Vong, Khan 7 Makara, Phnom Penh, Cambodia | SG |
| Offered Asset Classes & Services | FX, commodities, indices, CFDs trading | Multi-asset financial services |
| Execution Software & Terminals | MT5 | Proprietary / Web Platform |
| Supported Client Languages | English | English |
| Warning / Exposure Count | 0 recorded warning(s) | 0 recorded warning(s) |
| Specialized Sub-Page Audits |
Related 1v1 Institutional Comparisons
Compare CFD Capital and Core Starters against other regulated peers in our institutions licensed across asia-pacific and the middle east slice.
Frequently Asked Questions: CFD Capital vs Core Starters
Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.
Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: CFD Capital or Core Starters?
Both CFD Capital and Core Starters hold 0 regulated licence record(s) in our dataset. Specifically, CFD Capital maintains 0 total recorded filing(s) (none on file) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas Core Starters maintains 0 recorded filing(s) (none on file) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.
How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between CFD Capital and Core Starters?
In APAC Capital Brief's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), CFD Capital records an Overall Score of 2.0 (Risk & Licensing: 2.0, Brand: 2.0, Market Influence: 2.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 1.0), compared with Core Starters at 2.0 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 2.0, Brand: 2.0, Market Influence: 2.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 1.0).
How do CFD Capital and Core Starters differ in trading platforms and asset classes?
CFD Capital lists FX, commodities, indices, CFDs trading with execution software [MT5], while Core Starters lists general financial services with execution software [proprietary/web execution]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.
Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: CFD Capital or Core Starters?
CFD Capital carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while Core Starters carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).
Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.