1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison
D'CENT Wallet vs PGM: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit
Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of D'CENT Wallet (D'CENT Wallet) and PGM (PGM) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.
Coverage: Institutions licensed across Asia-Pacific and the Middle East
- D'CENT Wallet 6D Score
- 3.0
- PGM 6D Score
- 6.0
- Regulated Licences
- 0 vs 1
- Warning Flags
- 0 vs 0
PGM outranks D'CENT Wallet by +3.0 pts in composite 6D scoring (6.0 vs 3.0)
On supervisory breadth, D'CENT Wallet holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 0 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas PGM holds 1 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 1 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.
6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison
Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).
| Evaluation Dimension | Methodology Weight | D'CENT Wallet | PGM | Score Delta | Dimension Leader |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Composite 6D Score | 100% Composite | 3.0 | 6.0 | +3.0 | PGM |
| Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore) | 30% Weight | 3.0 | 6.0 | +3.0 | PGM |
| Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore) | 20% Weight | 1.0 | 3.0 | +2.0 | PGM |
| User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore) | 20% Weight | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore) | 15% Weight | 3.0 | 6.0 | +3.0 | PGM |
| Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore) | 15% Weight | 3.0 | 6.0 | +3.0 | PGM |
Visual Architecture Benchmark: D'CENT Wallet vs PGM
Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.
Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison
Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.
| Audit Attribute | D'CENT Wallet | PGM |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Legal Name | D'CENT Wallet | PGM |
| Source Risk Classification | Risk level not supplied | Risk level not supplied |
| Active Regulated / Total Filings | 0 regulated / 0 total (0 Tier-1) | 1 regulated / 1 total (0 Tier-1) |
| Recorded Certificate Numbers | None on file | |
| Registered Domicile / Address | 7th floor, Samsungdang Building, 747, Seolleung-ro, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, 06056, South Korea | INP MELBOURNE, Suite 103, 566 St kilda Road MELBOURNE VIC 3004 |
| Offered Asset Classes & Services | Transfers, cryptocurrencies, software wallets, card-based hardware wallets | FX pairs, indices, commodities and precious metals |
| Execution Software & Terminals | Proprietary / Web Platform | MT4, MT5 |
| Supported Client Languages | Spanish, Japanese, Chinese, English, Korean | English, Chinese, Japanese, Thai, Uyghur |
| Warning / Exposure Count | 0 recorded warning(s) | 0 recorded warning(s) |
| Specialized Sub-Page Audits |
Related 1v1 Institutional Comparisons
Compare D'CENT Wallet and PGM against other regulated peers in our institutions licensed across asia-pacific and the middle east slice.
Frequently Asked Questions: D'CENT Wallet vs PGM
Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.
Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: D'CENT Wallet or PGM?
PGM holds more active regulated filings (1 vs 0). Specifically, D'CENT Wallet maintains 0 total recorded filing(s) (none on file) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas PGM maintains 1 recorded filing(s) (ASIC) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.
How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between D'CENT Wallet and PGM?
In APAC Capital Brief's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), D'CENT Wallet records an Overall Score of 3.0 (Risk & Licensing: 3.0, Brand: 3.0, Market Influence: 3.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 1.0), compared with PGM at 6.0 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 6.0, Brand: 6.0, Market Influence: 6.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 3.0).
How do D'CENT Wallet and PGM differ in trading platforms and asset classes?
D'CENT Wallet lists Transfers, cryptocurrencies, software wallets, card-based hardware wallets with execution software [proprietary/web execution], while PGM lists FX pairs, indices, commodities and precious metals with execution software [MT4, MT5]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.
Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: D'CENT Wallet or PGM?
D'CENT Wallet carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while PGM carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).
Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.