1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison
Decode Capital vs Invast Global: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit
Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of Decode Capital (Decode Capital Pty Ltd) and Invast Global (Invast Financial Services Pty Ltd) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.
Coverage: Institutions licensed across Asia-Pacific and the Middle East
- Decode Capital 6D Score
- 2.0
- Invast Global 6D Score
- 6.0
- Regulated Licences
- 1 vs 1
- Warning Flags
- 0 vs 0
Invast Global outranks Decode Capital by +4.0 pts in composite 6D scoring (6.0 vs 2.0)
On supervisory breadth, Decode Capital holds 1 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 1 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas Invast Global holds 1 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 1 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.
6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison
Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).
| Evaluation Dimension | Methodology Weight | Decode Capital | Invast Global | Score Delta | Dimension Leader |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Composite 6D Score | 100% Composite | 2.0 | 6.0 | +4.0 | Invast Global |
| Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore) | 30% Weight | 2.0 | 6.0 | +4.0 | Invast Global |
| Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore) | 20% Weight | 1.0 | 3.0 | +2.0 | Invast Global |
| User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore) | 20% Weight | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore) | 15% Weight | 2.0 | 6.0 | +4.0 | Invast Global |
| Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore) | 15% Weight | 2.0 | 6.0 | +4.0 | Invast Global |
Visual Architecture Benchmark: Decode Capital vs Invast Global
Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.
Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison
Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.
| Audit Attribute | Decode Capital | Invast Global |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Legal Name | Decode Capital Pty Ltd | Invast Financial Services Pty Ltd |
| Source Risk Classification | Risk level not supplied | Risk level not supplied |
| Active Regulated / Total Filings | 1 regulated / 1 total (0 Tier-1) | 1 regulated / 1 total (0 Tier-1) |
| Recorded Certificate Numbers | ||
| Registered Domicile / Address | LEVEL 23, 111 Pacific Highway, NORTH SYDNEY NSW 2060 | Level 27, Aurora Place, 88 Phillip Street, Sydney NSW 2000 KOYO BUILDING, 1-5-6, Higashi-Nihonbashi, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, Japan 103-0004 |
| Offered Asset Classes & Services | CFDs, Indices, Forex, Commodities | single-stock and ETF synthetic products, stock-algorithm suite, FX and precious metals, indices and commodities |
| Execution Software & Terminals | MT4 | MT4, MT5 |
| Supported Client Languages | English | English |
| Warning / Exposure Count | 0 recorded warning(s) | 0 recorded warning(s) |
| Specialized Sub-Page Audits |
Related 1v1 Institutional Comparisons
Compare Decode Capital and Invast Global against other regulated peers in our institutions licensed across asia-pacific and the middle east slice.
Frequently Asked Questions: Decode Capital vs Invast Global
Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.
Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: Decode Capital or Invast Global?
Both Decode Capital and Invast Global hold 1 regulated licence record(s) in our dataset. Specifically, Decode Capital maintains 1 total recorded filing(s) (ASIC) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas Invast Global maintains 1 recorded filing(s) (ASIC) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.
How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between Decode Capital and Invast Global?
In APAC Capital Brief's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), Decode Capital records an Overall Score of 2.0 (Risk & Licensing: 2.0, Brand: 2.0, Market Influence: 2.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 1.0), compared with Invast Global at 6.0 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 6.0, Brand: 6.0, Market Influence: 6.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 3.0).
How do Decode Capital and Invast Global differ in trading platforms and asset classes?
Decode Capital lists CFDs, Indices, Forex, Commodities with execution software [MT4], while Invast Global lists single-stock and ETF synthetic products, stock-algorithm suite, FX and precious metals, indices and commodities with execution software [MT4, MT5]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.
Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: Decode Capital or Invast Global?
Decode Capital carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while Invast Global carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).
Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.