1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison
Decode Capital vs Liquid: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit
Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of Decode Capital (Decode Capital Pty Ltd) and Liquid (Liquid Pte. Ltd.) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.
Coverage: Institutions licensed across Asia-Pacific and the Middle East
- Decode Capital 6D Score
- 2.0
- Liquid 6D Score
- 2.0
- Regulated Licences
- 1 vs 1
- Warning Flags
- 0 vs 0
Decode Capital and Liquid are statistically tied in composite 6D scoring (2.0 vs 2.0)
On supervisory breadth, Decode Capital holds 1 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 1 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas Liquid holds 1 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 1 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.
6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison
Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).
| Evaluation Dimension | Methodology Weight | Decode Capital | Liquid | Score Delta | Dimension Leader |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Composite 6D Score | 100% Composite | 2.0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore) | 30% Weight | 2.0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore) | 20% Weight | 1.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore) | 20% Weight | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore) | 15% Weight | 2.0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore) | 15% Weight | 2.0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
Visual Architecture Benchmark: Decode Capital vs Liquid
Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.
Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison
Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.
| Audit Attribute | Decode Capital | Liquid |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Legal Name | Decode Capital Pty Ltd | Liquid Pte. Ltd. |
| Source Risk Classification | Risk level not supplied | Risk level not supplied |
| Active Regulated / Total Filings | 1 regulated / 1 total (0 Tier-1) | 1 regulated / 1 total (0 Tier-1) |
| Recorded Certificate Numbers | FSA: Not supplied | |
| Registered Domicile / Address | LEVEL 23, 111 Pacific Highway, NORTH SYDNEY NSW 2060 | JP |
| Offered Asset Classes & Services | CFDs, Indices, Forex, Commodities | Multi-asset financial services |
| Execution Software & Terminals | MT4 | Proprietary / Web Platform |
| Supported Client Languages | English | English |
| Warning / Exposure Count | 0 recorded warning(s) | 0 recorded warning(s) |
| Specialized Sub-Page Audits |
Related 1v1 Institutional Comparisons
Compare Decode Capital and Liquid against other regulated peers in our institutions licensed across asia-pacific and the middle east slice.
Frequently Asked Questions: Decode Capital vs Liquid
Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.
Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: Decode Capital or Liquid?
Both Decode Capital and Liquid hold 1 regulated licence record(s) in our dataset. Specifically, Decode Capital maintains 1 total recorded filing(s) (ASIC) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas Liquid maintains 1 recorded filing(s) (FSA) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.
How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between Decode Capital and Liquid?
In APAC Capital Brief's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), Decode Capital records an Overall Score of 2.0 (Risk & Licensing: 2.0, Brand: 2.0, Market Influence: 2.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 1.0), compared with Liquid at 2.0 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 2.0, Brand: 2.0, Market Influence: 2.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 1.0).
How do Decode Capital and Liquid differ in trading platforms and asset classes?
Decode Capital lists CFDs, Indices, Forex, Commodities with execution software [MT4], while Liquid lists general financial services with execution software [proprietary/web execution]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.
Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: Decode Capital or Liquid?
Decode Capital carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while Liquid carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).
Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.