Skip to content
APAC Capital Brief
Directory

1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison

DECODE MARKETS vs PGM: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit

Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of DECODE MARKETS (DECODE MARKETS) and PGM (PGM) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.

Coverage: Institutions licensed across Asia-Pacific and the Middle East

DECODE MARKETS 6D Score
1.0
PGM 6D Score
6.0
Regulated Licences
0 vs 1
Warning Flags
0 vs 0
DETERMINISTIC QUANTITATIVE VERDICTCanonical Pair: decode-markets-vs-pgm

PGM outranks DECODE MARKETS by +5.0 pts in composite 6D scoring (6.0 vs 1.0)

On supervisory breadth, DECODE MARKETS holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 0 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas PGM holds 1 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 1 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.

6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison

Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).

Evaluation DimensionMethodology WeightDECODE MARKETSPGMScore DeltaDimension Leader
Overall Composite 6D Score100% Composite1.06.0+5.0PGM
Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore)30% Weight1.06.0+5.0PGM
Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore)20% Weight1.03.0+2.0PGM
User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore)20% Weight0.00.00.0Statistical Tie
Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore)15% Weight1.06.0+5.0PGM
Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore)15% Weight1.06.0+5.0PGM

Visual Architecture Benchmark: DECODE MARKETS vs PGM

Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.

1v1 Institutional Counterparty Benchmark: DECODE MARKETS vs PGM
Exhibit: Side-by-side regulatory and 6D quantitative comparison between DECODE MARKETS and PGM.

Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison

Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.

Audit AttributeDECODE MARKETSPGM
Primary Legal NameDECODE MARKETSPGM
Source Risk ClassificationRisk level not suppliedRisk level not supplied
Active Regulated / Total Filings0 regulated / 0 total (0 Tier-1)1 regulated / 1 total (0 Tier-1)
Recorded Certificate NumbersNone on file
Registered Domicile / Address350 Collins Street, MELBOURNE VIC 3000INP MELBOURNE, Suite 103, 566 St kilda Road MELBOURNE VIC 3004
Offered Asset Classes & ServicesForexFX pairs, indices, commodities and precious metals
Execution Software & TerminalsProprietary / Web PlatformMT4, MT5
Supported Client LanguagesEnglish, Simplified Chinese, Traditional Chinese, Japanese, Korean, German, French, PskoEnglish, Chinese, Japanese, Thai, Uyghur
Warning / Exposure Count0 recorded warning(s)0 recorded warning(s)
Specialized Sub-Page Audits

Compare DECODE MARKETS and PGM against other regulated peers in our institutions licensed across asia-pacific and the middle east slice.

Frequently Asked Questions: DECODE MARKETS vs PGM

Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.

Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: DECODE MARKETS or PGM?

PGM holds more active regulated filings (1 vs 0). Specifically, DECODE MARKETS maintains 0 total recorded filing(s) (none on file) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas PGM maintains 1 recorded filing(s) (ASIC) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.

How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between DECODE MARKETS and PGM?

In APAC Capital Brief's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), DECODE MARKETS records an Overall Score of 1.0 (Risk & Licensing: 1.0, Brand: 1.0, Market Influence: 1.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 1.0), compared with PGM at 6.0 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 6.0, Brand: 6.0, Market Influence: 6.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 3.0).

How do DECODE MARKETS and PGM differ in trading platforms and asset classes?

DECODE MARKETS lists Forex with execution software [proprietary/web execution], while PGM lists FX pairs, indices, commodities and precious metals with execution software [MT4, MT5]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.

Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: DECODE MARKETS or PGM?

DECODE MARKETS carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while PGM carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).

Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.

DECODE MARKETS vs PGM (2026) — Regulation, 6D Score, Safety & Fee Comparison | APAC Capital Brief