Skip to content
APAC Capital Brief
Directory

1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison

DIDIMAX vs SCDEX: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit

Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of DIDIMAX (DIDIMAX) and SCDEX (SCDEX GLOBAL DIGITAL EXCHANGE) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.

Coverage: Institutions licensed across Asia-Pacific and the Middle East

DIDIMAX 6D Score
6.0
SCDEX 6D Score
9.3
Regulated Licences
1 vs 0
Warning Flags
0 vs 0
DETERMINISTIC QUANTITATIVE VERDICTCanonical Pair: didimax-vs-scdex

SCDEX outranks DIDIMAX by +3.3 pts in composite 6D scoring (9.3 vs 6.0)

On supervisory breadth, DIDIMAX holds 1 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 1 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas SCDEX holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 2 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.

6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison

Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).

Evaluation DimensionMethodology WeightDIDIMAXSCDEXScore DeltaDimension Leader
Overall Composite 6D Score100% Composite6.09.3+3.3SCDEX
Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore)30% Weight6.09.5+3.5SCDEX
Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore)20% Weight4.09.3+5.3SCDEX
User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore)20% Weight0.09.2+9.2SCDEX
Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore)15% Weight6.09.4+3.4SCDEX
Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore)15% Weight6.09.1+3.1SCDEX

Visual Architecture Benchmark: DIDIMAX vs SCDEX

Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.

1v1 Institutional Counterparty Benchmark: DIDIMAX vs SCDEX
Exhibit: Side-by-side regulatory and 6D quantitative comparison between DIDIMAX and SCDEX.

Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison

Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.

Audit AttributeDIDIMAXSCDEX
Primary Legal NameDIDIMAXSCDEX GLOBAL DIGITAL EXCHANGE
Source Risk ClassificationRisk level not suppliedLow risk
Active Regulated / Total Filings1 regulated / 1 total (0 Tier-1)0 regulated / 2 total (0 Tier-1)
Recorded Certificate Numbers
Registered Domicile / AddressJalan Garuda No. 88 Bandung Kel. Garuda Kec. Andir, Bandung - Jawa Barat 401841312 17th Street Suite 692, Denver, COLORADO 80202
Offered Asset Classes & ServicesFX pairs, commodities, metals, indices and futuresCrypto spot trading, Cryptocurrencies, Futures, Options, Derivatives contracts, Forex, Stocks, Asset management, Wealth management, Payments, Remittances
Execution Software & TerminalsMT5SCDEX Web Terminal, SCDEX Desktop Workflow, SCDEX Copy Trading Engine
Supported Client LanguagesIndonesian, EnglishEnglish, Traditional Chinese, Japanese, Korean, German, French, Spanish, Portuguese, Turkish, Vietnamese, Thai
Warning / Exposure Count0 recorded warning(s)0 recorded warning(s)
Specialized Sub-Page Audits

Compare DIDIMAX and SCDEX against other regulated peers in our institutions licensed across asia-pacific and the middle east slice.

Frequently Asked Questions: DIDIMAX vs SCDEX

Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.

Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: DIDIMAX or SCDEX?

DIDIMAX holds more active regulated filings (1 vs 0). Specifically, DIDIMAX maintains 1 total recorded filing(s) (Commodity Futures Trading Regulatory Agency of Indonesia (BAPPEBTI)) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas SCDEX maintains 2 recorded filing(s) (NFA, FinCEN) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.

How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between DIDIMAX and SCDEX?

In APAC Capital Brief's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), DIDIMAX records an Overall Score of 6.0 (Risk & Licensing: 6.0, Brand: 6.0, Market Influence: 6.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 4.0), compared with SCDEX at 9.3 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 9.5, Brand: 9.4, Market Influence: 9.1, User Reputation: 9.2, Execution & Software: 9.3).

How do DIDIMAX and SCDEX differ in trading platforms and asset classes?

DIDIMAX lists FX pairs, commodities, metals, indices and futures with execution software [MT5], while SCDEX lists Crypto spot trading, Cryptocurrencies, Futures, Options, Derivatives contracts, Forex, Stocks, Asset management, Wealth management, Payments, Remittances with execution software [SCDEX Web Terminal, SCDEX Desktop Workflow, SCDEX Copy Trading Engine]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.

Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: DIDIMAX or SCDEX?

DIDIMAX carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while SCDEX carries a "Low risk" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).

Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.

DIDIMAX vs SCDEX (2026) — Regulation, 6D Score, Safety & Fee Comparison | APAC Capital Brief