Skip to content
APAC Capital Brief
Directory

1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison

FAIR MARKETS vs IG: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit

Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of FAIR MARKETS (FairMarkets Trading Pty Ltd) and IG (IG Markets) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.

Coverage: Institutions licensed across Asia-Pacific and the Middle East

FAIR MARKETS 6D Score
6.0
IG 6D Score
8.0
Regulated Licences
1 vs 4
Warning Flags
0 vs 0
DETERMINISTIC QUANTITATIVE VERDICTCanonical Pair: fair-markets-vs-ig

IG outranks FAIR MARKETS by +2.0 pts in composite 6D scoring (8.0 vs 6.0)

On supervisory breadth, FAIR MARKETS holds 1 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 1 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas IG holds 4 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 4 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.

6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison

Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).

Evaluation DimensionMethodology WeightFAIR MARKETSIGScore DeltaDimension Leader
Overall Composite 6D Score100% Composite6.08.0+2.0IG
Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore)30% Weight4.08.0+4.0IG
Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore)20% Weight4.05.0+1.0IG
User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore)20% Weight0.00.00.0Statistical Tie
Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore)15% Weight5.09.0+4.0IG
Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore)15% Weight6.08.0+2.0IG

Visual Architecture Benchmark: FAIR MARKETS vs IG

Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.

1v1 Institutional Counterparty Benchmark: FAIR MARKETS vs IG
Exhibit: Side-by-side regulatory and 6D quantitative comparison between FAIR MARKETS and IG.

Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison

Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.

Audit AttributeFAIR MARKETSIG
Primary Legal NameFairMarkets Trading Pty LtdIG Markets
Source Risk ClassificationRisk level not suppliedRisk level not supplied
Active Regulated / Total Filings1 regulated / 1 total (0 Tier-1)4 regulated / 4 total (0 Tier-1)
Recorded Certificate Numbers
Registered Domicile / AddressLevel 26, 1 Bligh St, Sydney NSW 2000, Australia The Cyberati Lounge, Ground Floor, Silicon Avenue 40 Cybercity, 72201 Ebene Republic of MauritiusCannon Bridge House 25 Dowgate Hill London EC4R 2YA
Offered Asset Classes & Servicesproducts, stocks, FX, commodities, oil trading, silver trading, index CFDsFX, indices, stock CFDs, digital cryptocurrencies, options trading and related services
Execution Software & TerminalsMT4, MT5IG Trading: CFDs & stocks, MT5
Supported Client LanguagesEnglish, Chinese (Simplified), Chinese (Traditional), Tagalog, Vietnamese, Thai, HindiOther regional languages, Chinese (Simplified), Chinese (Traditional), Spanish, English
Warning / Exposure Count0 recorded warning(s)0 recorded warning(s)
Specialized Sub-Page Audits

Compare FAIR MARKETS and IG against other regulated peers in our institutions licensed across asia-pacific and the middle east slice.

Frequently Asked Questions: FAIR MARKETS vs IG

Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.

Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: FAIR MARKETS or IG?

IG holds more active regulated filings (4 vs 1). Specifically, FAIR MARKETS maintains 1 total recorded filing(s) (ASIC) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas IG maintains 4 recorded filing(s) (FSCA, MAS, ASIC, Financial Conduct Authority) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.

How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between FAIR MARKETS and IG?

In APAC Capital Brief's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), FAIR MARKETS records an Overall Score of 6.0 (Risk & Licensing: 4.0, Brand: 5.0, Market Influence: 6.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 4.0), compared with IG at 8.0 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 8.0, Brand: 9.0, Market Influence: 8.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 5.0).

How do FAIR MARKETS and IG differ in trading platforms and asset classes?

FAIR MARKETS lists products, stocks, FX, commodities, oil trading, silver trading, index CFDs with execution software [MT4, MT5], while IG lists FX, indices, stock CFDs, digital cryptocurrencies, options trading and related services with execution software [IG Trading: CFDs & stocks, MT5]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.

Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: FAIR MARKETS or IG?

FAIR MARKETS carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while IG carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).

Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.

FAIR MARKETS vs IG (2026) — Regulation, 6D Score, Safety & Fee Comparison | APAC Capital Brief