Skip to content
APAC Capital Brief
Directory

1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison

FUBON vs INF: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit

Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of FUBON (FUBON SECURITIES (HONG KONG) LIMITED) and INF (Infinitas Global Limited) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.

Coverage: Institutions licensed across Asia-Pacific and the Middle East

FUBON 6D Score
5.0
INF 6D Score
5.0
Regulated Licences
1 vs 0
Warning Flags
0 vs 0
DETERMINISTIC QUANTITATIVE VERDICTCanonical Pair: fubon-vs-inf

FUBON and INF are statistically tied in composite 6D scoring (5.0 vs 5.0)

On supervisory breadth, FUBON holds 1 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 1 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas INF holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 0 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.

6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison

Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).

Evaluation DimensionMethodology WeightFUBONINFScore DeltaDimension Leader
Overall Composite 6D Score100% Composite5.05.00.0Statistical Tie
Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore)30% Weight5.05.00.0Statistical Tie
Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore)20% Weight3.03.00.0Statistical Tie
User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore)20% Weight0.00.00.0Statistical Tie
Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore)15% Weight5.05.00.0Statistical Tie
Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore)15% Weight5.05.00.0Statistical Tie

Visual Architecture Benchmark: FUBON vs INF

Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.

1v1 Institutional Counterparty Benchmark: FUBON vs INF
Exhibit: Side-by-side regulatory and 6D quantitative comparison between FUBON and INF.

Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison

Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.

Audit AttributeFUBONINF
Primary Legal NameFUBON SECURITIES (HONG KONG) LIMITEDInfinitas Global Limited
Source Risk ClassificationRisk level not suppliedRisk level not supplied
Active Regulated / Total Filings1 regulated / 1 total (0 Tier-1)0 regulated / 0 total (0 Tier-1)
Recorded Certificate NumbersNone on file
Registered Domicile / AddressHKFlat/Rm A, 12/F, ZJ 300, 300 Lockhart Road, Wan Chai, Hong Kong / ROOM E 21/F NEICH TOWER 128 GLOUCESTER RD,HONG KONG
Offered Asset Classes & ServicesSecurities trading and futures businessMulti-asset financial services
Execution Software & TerminalsProprietary / Web PlatformMT4
Supported Client LanguagesChinese (Simplified), Chinese (Traditional), EnglishChinese (Simplified), Chinese (Traditional), Vietnamese, English, Japanese, Korean, Thai
Warning / Exposure Count0 recorded warning(s)0 recorded warning(s)
Specialized Sub-Page Audits

Compare FUBON and INF against other regulated peers in our institutions licensed across asia-pacific and the middle east slice.

Frequently Asked Questions: FUBON vs INF

Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.

Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: FUBON or INF?

FUBON holds more active regulated filings (1 vs 0). Specifically, FUBON maintains 1 total recorded filing(s) (SFC) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas INF maintains 0 recorded filing(s) (none on file) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.

How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between FUBON and INF?

In APAC Capital Brief's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), FUBON records an Overall Score of 5.0 (Risk & Licensing: 5.0, Brand: 5.0, Market Influence: 5.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 3.0), compared with INF at 5.0 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 5.0, Brand: 5.0, Market Influence: 5.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 3.0).

How do FUBON and INF differ in trading platforms and asset classes?

FUBON lists Securities trading and futures business with execution software [proprietary/web execution], while INF lists general financial services with execution software [MT4]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.

Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: FUBON or INF?

FUBON carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while INF carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).

Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.

FUBON vs INF (2026) — Regulation, 6D Score, Safety & Fee Comparison | APAC Capital Brief