1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison
FXTF vs Macro Markets: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit
Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of FXTF (Goldenway Japan Co., Ltd.) and Macro Markets (Macro Markets Solutions Pty Ltd) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.
Coverage: Institutions licensed across Asia-Pacific and the Middle East
- FXTF 6D Score
- 7.0
- Macro Markets 6D Score
- 6.0
- Regulated Licences
- 1 vs 1
- Warning Flags
- 0 vs 0
FXTF outranks Macro Markets by +1.0 pts in composite 6D scoring (7.0 vs 6.0)
On supervisory breadth, FXTF holds 1 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 1 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas Macro Markets holds 1 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 1 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.
6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison
Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).
| Evaluation Dimension | Methodology Weight | FXTF | Macro Markets | Score Delta | Dimension Leader |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Composite 6D Score | 100% Composite | 7.0 | 6.0 | +1.0 | FXTF |
| Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore) | 30% Weight | 7.0 | 6.0 | +1.0 | FXTF |
| Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore) | 20% Weight | 4.0 | 3.0 | +1.0 | FXTF |
| User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore) | 20% Weight | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore) | 15% Weight | 7.0 | 6.0 | +1.0 | FXTF |
| Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore) | 15% Weight | 7.0 | 6.0 | +1.0 | FXTF |
Visual Architecture Benchmark: FXTF vs Macro Markets
Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.
Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison
Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.
| Audit Attribute | FXTF | Macro Markets |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Legal Name | Goldenway Japan Co., Ltd. | Macro Markets Solutions Pty Ltd |
| Source Risk Classification | Risk level not supplied | Risk level not supplied |
| Active Regulated / Total Filings | 1 regulated / 1 total (0 Tier-1) | 1 regulated / 1 total (0 Tier-1) |
| Recorded Certificate Numbers | ||
| Registered Domicile / Address | 108-0073 2-11-15 Mita, Minato-ku, East Kyoto 4F, Mita Kawasaki Tower | Suite 02,Level 30, 25 Bligh Street Sydney NSW 2000 |
| Offered Asset Classes & Services | Margin trading services for currency pairs | Precious metals, Indices, Forex, Stocks |
| Execution Software & Terminals | MT4 | Proprietary / Web Platform |
| Supported Client Languages | Japanese | Vietnamese, Chinese, English |
| Warning / Exposure Count | 0 recorded warning(s) | 0 recorded warning(s) |
| Specialized Sub-Page Audits |
Related 1v1 Institutional Comparisons
Compare FXTF and Macro Markets against other regulated peers in our institutions licensed across asia-pacific and the middle east slice.
Frequently Asked Questions: FXTF vs Macro Markets
Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.
Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: FXTF or Macro Markets?
Both FXTF and Macro Markets hold 1 regulated licence record(s) in our dataset. Specifically, FXTF maintains 1 total recorded filing(s) (FSA) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas Macro Markets maintains 1 recorded filing(s) (ASIC) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.
How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between FXTF and Macro Markets?
In APAC Capital Brief's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), FXTF records an Overall Score of 7.0 (Risk & Licensing: 7.0, Brand: 7.0, Market Influence: 7.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 4.0), compared with Macro Markets at 6.0 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 6.0, Brand: 6.0, Market Influence: 6.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 3.0).
How do FXTF and Macro Markets differ in trading platforms and asset classes?
FXTF lists Margin trading services for currency pairs with execution software [MT4], while Macro Markets lists Precious metals, Indices, Forex, Stocks with execution software [proprietary/web execution]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.
Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: FXTF or Macro Markets?
FXTF carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while Macro Markets carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).
Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.