Skip to content
APAC Capital Brief
Directory

1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison

FXTF vs Statemind: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit

Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of FXTF (Goldenway Japan Co., Ltd.) and Statemind (Statemind) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.

Coverage: Institutions licensed across Asia-Pacific and the Middle East

FXTF 6D Score
7.0
Statemind 6D Score
5.0
Regulated Licences
1 vs 0
Warning Flags
0 vs 0
DETERMINISTIC QUANTITATIVE VERDICTCanonical Pair: fxtf-vs-statemind

FXTF outranks Statemind by +2.0 pts in composite 6D scoring (7.0 vs 5.0)

On supervisory breadth, FXTF holds 1 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 1 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas Statemind holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 0 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.

6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison

Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).

Evaluation DimensionMethodology WeightFXTFStatemindScore DeltaDimension Leader
Overall Composite 6D Score100% Composite7.05.0+2.0FXTF
Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore)30% Weight7.05.0+2.0FXTF
Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore)20% Weight4.03.0+1.0FXTF
User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore)20% Weight0.00.00.0Statistical Tie
Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore)15% Weight7.05.0+2.0FXTF
Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore)15% Weight7.05.0+2.0FXTF

Visual Architecture Benchmark: FXTF vs Statemind

Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.

1v1 Institutional Counterparty Benchmark: FXTF vs Statemind
Exhibit: Side-by-side regulatory and 6D quantitative comparison between FXTF and Statemind.

Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison

Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.

Audit AttributeFXTFStatemind
Primary Legal NameGoldenway Japan Co., Ltd.Statemind
Source Risk ClassificationRisk level not suppliedRisk level not supplied
Active Regulated / Total Filings1 regulated / 1 total (0 Tier-1)0 regulated / 0 total (0 Tier-1)
Recorded Certificate NumbersNone on file
Registered Domicile / Address108-0073 2-11-15 Mita, Minato-ku, East Kyoto 4F, Mita Kawasaki Tower--
Offered Asset Classes & ServicesMargin trading services for currency pairsSmart contract audit, blockchain security assessment, security consulting and training
Execution Software & TerminalsMT4Proprietary / Web Platform
Supported Client LanguagesJapaneseEnglish
Warning / Exposure Count0 recorded warning(s)0 recorded warning(s)
Specialized Sub-Page Audits

Compare FXTF and Statemind against other regulated peers in our institutions licensed across asia-pacific and the middle east slice.

Frequently Asked Questions: FXTF vs Statemind

Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.

Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: FXTF or Statemind?

FXTF holds more active regulated filings (1 vs 0). Specifically, FXTF maintains 1 total recorded filing(s) (FSA) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas Statemind maintains 0 recorded filing(s) (none on file) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.

How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between FXTF and Statemind?

In APAC Capital Brief's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), FXTF records an Overall Score of 7.0 (Risk & Licensing: 7.0, Brand: 7.0, Market Influence: 7.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 4.0), compared with Statemind at 5.0 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 5.0, Brand: 5.0, Market Influence: 5.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 3.0).

How do FXTF and Statemind differ in trading platforms and asset classes?

FXTF lists Margin trading services for currency pairs with execution software [MT4], while Statemind lists Smart contract audit, blockchain security assessment, security consulting and training with execution software [proprietary/web execution]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.

Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: FXTF or Statemind?

FXTF carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while Statemind carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).

Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.

FXTF vs Statemind (2026) — Regulation, 6D Score, Safety & Fee Comparison | APAC Capital Brief