1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison
HyperPay Wallet vs IconFX: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit
Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of HyperPay Wallet (HyperPay Wallet) and IconFX (Icon Tech LLC) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.
Coverage: Institutions licensed across Asia-Pacific and the Middle East
- HyperPay Wallet 6D Score
- 3.7
- IconFX 6D Score
- 4.0
- Regulated Licences
- 0 vs 0
- Warning Flags
- 0 vs 0
IconFX outranks HyperPay Wallet by +0.3 pts in composite 6D scoring (4.0 vs 3.7)
On supervisory breadth, HyperPay Wallet holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 0 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas IconFX holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 0 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.
6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison
Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).
| Evaluation Dimension | Methodology Weight | HyperPay Wallet | IconFX | Score Delta | Dimension Leader |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Composite 6D Score | 100% Composite | 3.7 | 4.0 | +0.3 | IconFX |
| Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore) | 30% Weight | 3.7 | 4.0 | +0.3 | IconFX |
| Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore) | 20% Weight | 3.0 | 2.0 | +1.0 | HyperPay Wallet |
| User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore) | 20% Weight | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore) | 15% Weight | 3.6 | 4.0 | +0.4 | IconFX |
| Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore) | 15% Weight | 3.8 | 4.0 | +0.2 | IconFX |
Visual Architecture Benchmark: HyperPay Wallet vs IconFX
Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.
Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison
Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.
| Audit Attribute | HyperPay Wallet | IconFX |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Legal Name | HyperPay Wallet | Icon Tech LLC |
| Source Risk Classification | Risk level not supplied | Risk level not supplied |
| Active Regulated / Total Filings | 0 regulated / 0 total (0 Tier-1) | 0 regulated / 0 total (0 Tier-1) |
| Recorded Certificate Numbers | None on file | None on file |
| Registered Domicile / Address | -- | MILSONS POINT NSW 2061 |
| Offered Asset Classes & Services | Wallet service, also involved in multiple dimensions such as blockchain education, technical infrastructure, and DeFi project incubation | Multi-asset financial services |
| Execution Software & Terminals | HyperPay, HyperPay :Wallet Crypto & Card | Proprietary / Web Platform |
| Supported Client Languages | Chinese, English | Spanish, English, French |
| Warning / Exposure Count | 0 recorded warning(s) | 0 recorded warning(s) |
| Specialized Sub-Page Audits |
Related 1v1 Institutional Comparisons
Compare HyperPay Wallet and IconFX against other regulated peers in our institutions licensed across asia-pacific and the middle east slice.
Frequently Asked Questions: HyperPay Wallet vs IconFX
Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.
Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: HyperPay Wallet or IconFX?
Both HyperPay Wallet and IconFX hold 0 regulated licence record(s) in our dataset. Specifically, HyperPay Wallet maintains 0 total recorded filing(s) (none on file) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas IconFX maintains 0 recorded filing(s) (none on file) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.
How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between HyperPay Wallet and IconFX?
In APAC Capital Brief's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), HyperPay Wallet records an Overall Score of 3.7 (Risk & Licensing: 3.7, Brand: 3.6, Market Influence: 3.8, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 3.0), compared with IconFX at 4.0 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 4.0, Brand: 4.0, Market Influence: 4.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 2.0).
How do HyperPay Wallet and IconFX differ in trading platforms and asset classes?
HyperPay Wallet lists Wallet service, also involved in multiple dimensions such as blockchain education, technical infrastructure, and DeFi project incubation with execution software [HyperPay, HyperPay :Wallet Crypto & Card], while IconFX lists general financial services with execution software [proprietary/web execution]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.
Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: HyperPay Wallet or IconFX?
HyperPay Wallet carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while IconFX carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).
Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.