1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison
IBF vs PANONY: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit
Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of IBF (PT. International Business Futures) and PANONY (PANONY Limited) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.
Coverage: Institutions licensed across Asia-Pacific and the Middle East
- IBF 6D Score
- 1.7
- PANONY 6D Score
- 1.6
- Regulated Licences
- 0 vs 0
- Warning Flags
- 0 vs 0
IBF outranks PANONY by +0.1 pts in composite 6D scoring (1.7 vs 1.6)
On supervisory breadth, IBF holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 0 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas PANONY holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 0 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.
6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison
Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).
| Evaluation Dimension | Methodology Weight | IBF | PANONY | Score Delta | Dimension Leader |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Composite 6D Score | 100% Composite | 1.7 | 1.6 | +0.1 | IBF |
| Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore) | 30% Weight | 1.7 | 1.9 | +0.2 | PANONY |
| Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore) | 20% Weight | 1.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore) | 20% Weight | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore) | 15% Weight | 1.7 | 1.6 | +0.1 | IBF |
| Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore) | 15% Weight | 1.7 | 1.9 | +0.2 | PANONY |
Visual Architecture Benchmark: IBF vs PANONY
Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.
Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison
Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.
| Audit Attribute | IBF | PANONY |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Legal Name | PT. International Business Futures | PANONY Limited |
| Source Risk Classification | Risk level not supplied | Risk level not supplied |
| Active Regulated / Total Filings | 0 regulated / 0 total (0 Tier-1) | 0 regulated / 0 total (0 Tier-1) |
| Recorded Certificate Numbers | None on file | None on file |
| Registered Domicile / Address | Paskal Hyper Square Blok D No. 45-46, Jl. H.O.S CokroaMinoTo No. 25-27 BandunG 40181 Paskal Hyper Square Blok D No.45-46 Jl. H.O.S Cokroaminoto No.25-27 Bandung, Jawa Barat – 40181 | - |
| Offered Asset Classes & Services | Foreign exchange, metals and energy, Asian indices, US indices | Multi-asset financial services |
| Execution Software & Terminals | MT4 | Proprietary / Web Platform |
| Supported Client Languages | Indonesian | English |
| Warning / Exposure Count | 0 recorded warning(s) | 0 recorded warning(s) |
| Specialized Sub-Page Audits |
Related 1v1 Institutional Comparisons
Compare IBF and PANONY against other regulated peers in our institutions licensed across asia-pacific and the middle east slice.
Frequently Asked Questions: IBF vs PANONY
Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.
Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: IBF or PANONY?
Both IBF and PANONY hold 0 regulated licence record(s) in our dataset. Specifically, IBF maintains 0 total recorded filing(s) (none on file) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas PANONY maintains 0 recorded filing(s) (none on file) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.
How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between IBF and PANONY?
In APAC Capital Brief's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), IBF records an Overall Score of 1.7 (Risk & Licensing: 1.7, Brand: 1.7, Market Influence: 1.7, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 1.0), compared with PANONY at 1.6 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 1.9, Brand: 1.6, Market Influence: 1.9, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 1.0).
How do IBF and PANONY differ in trading platforms and asset classes?
IBF lists Foreign exchange, metals and energy, Asian indices, US indices with execution software [MT4], while PANONY lists general financial services with execution software [proprietary/web execution]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.
Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: IBF or PANONY?
IBF carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while PANONY carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).
Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.