Skip to content
APAC Capital Brief
Directory

1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison

IBF vs Zoomex: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit

Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of IBF (PT. International Business Futures) and Zoomex (Zoomex) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.

Coverage: Institutions licensed across Asia-Pacific and the Middle East

IBF 6D Score
1.7
Zoomex 6D Score
2.0
Regulated Licences
0 vs 0
Warning Flags
0 vs 0
DETERMINISTIC QUANTITATIVE VERDICTCanonical Pair: ibf-vs-zoomex

Zoomex outranks IBF by +0.3 pts in composite 6D scoring (2.0 vs 1.7)

On supervisory breadth, IBF holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 0 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas Zoomex holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 0 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.

6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison

Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).

Evaluation DimensionMethodology WeightIBFZoomexScore DeltaDimension Leader
Overall Composite 6D Score100% Composite1.72.0+0.3Zoomex
Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore)30% Weight1.72.0+0.3Zoomex
Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore)20% Weight1.01.00.0Statistical Tie
User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore)20% Weight0.00.00.0Statistical Tie
Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore)15% Weight1.72.0+0.3Zoomex
Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore)15% Weight1.72.0+0.3Zoomex

Visual Architecture Benchmark: IBF vs Zoomex

Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.

1v1 Institutional Counterparty Benchmark: IBF vs Zoomex
Exhibit: Side-by-side regulatory and 6D quantitative comparison between IBF and Zoomex.

Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison

Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.

Audit AttributeIBFZoomex
Primary Legal NamePT. International Business FuturesZoomex
Source Risk ClassificationRisk level not suppliedRisk level not supplied
Active Regulated / Total Filings0 regulated / 0 total (0 Tier-1)0 regulated / 0 total (0 Tier-1)
Recorded Certificate NumbersNone on fileNone on file
Registered Domicile / AddressPaskal Hyper Square Blok D No. 45-46, Jl. H.O.S CokroaMinoTo No. 25-27 BandunG 40181 Paskal Hyper Square Blok D No.45-46 Jl. H.O.S Cokroaminoto No.25-27 Bandung, Jawa Barat – 40181SG
Offered Asset Classes & ServicesForeign exchange, metals and energy, Asian indices, US indicesMulti-asset financial services
Execution Software & TerminalsMT4Proprietary / Web Platform
Supported Client LanguagesIndonesianEnglish
Warning / Exposure Count0 recorded warning(s)0 recorded warning(s)
Specialized Sub-Page Audits

Compare IBF and Zoomex against other regulated peers in our institutions licensed across asia-pacific and the middle east slice.

Frequently Asked Questions: IBF vs Zoomex

Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.

Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: IBF or Zoomex?

Both IBF and Zoomex hold 0 regulated licence record(s) in our dataset. Specifically, IBF maintains 0 total recorded filing(s) (none on file) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas Zoomex maintains 0 recorded filing(s) (none on file) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.

How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between IBF and Zoomex?

In APAC Capital Brief's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), IBF records an Overall Score of 1.7 (Risk & Licensing: 1.7, Brand: 1.7, Market Influence: 1.7, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 1.0), compared with Zoomex at 2.0 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 2.0, Brand: 2.0, Market Influence: 2.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 1.0).

How do IBF and Zoomex differ in trading platforms and asset classes?

IBF lists Foreign exchange, metals and energy, Asian indices, US indices with execution software [MT4], while Zoomex lists general financial services with execution software [proprietary/web execution]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.

Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: IBF or Zoomex?

IBF carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while Zoomex carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).

Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.

IBF vs Zoomex (2026) — Regulation, 6D Score, Safety & Fee Comparison | APAC Capital Brief