Skip to content
APAC Capital Brief
Directory

1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison

ICICIDirect vs SCDEX: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit

Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of ICICIDirect (ICICIDirect) and SCDEX (SCDEX GLOBAL DIGITAL EXCHANGE) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.

Coverage: Institutions licensed across Asia-Pacific and the Middle East

ICICIDirect 6D Score
6.3
SCDEX 6D Score
9.3
Regulated Licences
1 vs 0
Warning Flags
0 vs 0
DETERMINISTIC QUANTITATIVE VERDICTCanonical Pair: icicidirect-vs-scdex

SCDEX outranks ICICIDirect by +3.0 pts in composite 6D scoring (9.3 vs 6.3)

On supervisory breadth, ICICIDirect holds 1 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 1 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas SCDEX holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 2 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.

6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison

Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).

Evaluation DimensionMethodology WeightICICIDirectSCDEXScore DeltaDimension Leader
Overall Composite 6D Score100% Composite6.39.3+3.0SCDEX
Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore)30% Weight6.39.5+3.2SCDEX
Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore)20% Weight3.09.3+6.3SCDEX
User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore)20% Weight0.09.2+9.2SCDEX
Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore)15% Weight6.39.4+3.1SCDEX
Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore)15% Weight6.39.1+2.8SCDEX

Visual Architecture Benchmark: ICICIDirect vs SCDEX

Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.

1v1 Institutional Counterparty Benchmark: ICICIDirect vs SCDEX
Exhibit: Side-by-side regulatory and 6D quantitative comparison between ICICIDirect and SCDEX.

Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison

Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.

Audit AttributeICICIDirectSCDEX
Primary Legal NameICICIDirectSCDEX GLOBAL DIGITAL EXCHANGE
Source Risk ClassificationRisk level not suppliedLow risk
Active Regulated / Total Filings1 regulated / 1 total (0 Tier-1)0 regulated / 2 total (0 Tier-1)
Recorded Certificate Numbers
Registered Domicile / AddressCICI Venture House, Appasaheb Marathe Marg, Mumbai - 400025, India1312 17th Street Suite 692, Denver, COLORADO 80202
Offered Asset Classes & ServicesStock trading, futures and options trading, investment funds, bonds, insurance, etc.Crypto spot trading, Cryptocurrencies, Futures, Options, Derivatives contracts, Forex, Stocks, Asset management, Wealth management, Payments, Remittances
Execution Software & TerminalsProprietary / Web PlatformSCDEX Web Terminal, SCDEX Desktop Workflow, SCDEX Copy Trading Engine
Supported Client LanguagesEnglishEnglish, Traditional Chinese, Japanese, Korean, German, French, Spanish, Portuguese, Turkish, Vietnamese, Thai
Warning / Exposure Count0 recorded warning(s)0 recorded warning(s)
Specialized Sub-Page Audits

Compare ICICIDirect and SCDEX against other regulated peers in our institutions licensed across asia-pacific and the middle east slice.

Frequently Asked Questions: ICICIDirect vs SCDEX

Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.

Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: ICICIDirect or SCDEX?

ICICIDirect holds more active regulated filings (1 vs 0). Specifically, ICICIDirect maintains 1 total recorded filing(s) (SEBI) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas SCDEX maintains 2 recorded filing(s) (NFA, FinCEN) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.

How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between ICICIDirect and SCDEX?

In APAC Capital Brief's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), ICICIDirect records an Overall Score of 6.3 (Risk & Licensing: 6.3, Brand: 6.3, Market Influence: 6.3, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 3.0), compared with SCDEX at 9.3 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 9.5, Brand: 9.4, Market Influence: 9.1, User Reputation: 9.2, Execution & Software: 9.3).

How do ICICIDirect and SCDEX differ in trading platforms and asset classes?

ICICIDirect lists Stock trading, futures and options trading, investment funds, bonds, insurance, etc. with execution software [proprietary/web execution], while SCDEX lists Crypto spot trading, Cryptocurrencies, Futures, Options, Derivatives contracts, Forex, Stocks, Asset management, Wealth management, Payments, Remittances with execution software [SCDEX Web Terminal, SCDEX Desktop Workflow, SCDEX Copy Trading Engine]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.

Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: ICICIDirect or SCDEX?

ICICIDirect carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while SCDEX carries a "Low risk" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).

Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.

ICICIDirect vs SCDEX (2026) — Regulation, 6D Score, Safety & Fee Comparison | APAC Capital Brief