Skip to content
APAC Capital Brief
Directory

1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison

ICICIDirect vs UTRADE: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit

Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of ICICIDirect (ICICIDirect) and UTRADE (UOB Kay Hian) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.

Coverage: Institutions licensed across Asia-Pacific and the Middle East

ICICIDirect 6D Score
6.3
UTRADE 6D Score
5.0
Regulated Licences
1 vs 1
Warning Flags
0 vs 0
DETERMINISTIC QUANTITATIVE VERDICTCanonical Pair: icicidirect-vs-utrade

ICICIDirect outranks UTRADE by +1.3 pts in composite 6D scoring (6.3 vs 5.0)

On supervisory breadth, ICICIDirect holds 1 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 1 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas UTRADE holds 1 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 1 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.

6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison

Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).

Evaluation DimensionMethodology WeightICICIDirectUTRADEScore DeltaDimension Leader
Overall Composite 6D Score100% Composite6.35.0+1.3ICICIDirect
Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore)30% Weight6.35.0+1.3ICICIDirect
Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore)20% Weight3.03.00.0Statistical Tie
User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore)20% Weight0.00.00.0Statistical Tie
Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore)15% Weight6.35.0+1.3ICICIDirect
Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore)15% Weight6.35.0+1.3ICICIDirect

Visual Architecture Benchmark: ICICIDirect vs UTRADE

Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.

1v1 Institutional Counterparty Benchmark: ICICIDirect vs UTRADE
Exhibit: Side-by-side regulatory and 6D quantitative comparison between ICICIDirect and UTRADE.

Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison

Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.

Audit AttributeICICIDirectUTRADE
Primary Legal NameICICIDirectUOB Kay Hian
Source Risk ClassificationRisk level not suppliedRisk level not supplied
Active Regulated / Total Filings1 regulated / 1 total (0 Tier-1)1 regulated / 1 total (0 Tier-1)
Recorded Certificate Numbers
Registered Domicile / AddressCICI Venture House, Appasaheb Marathe Marg, Mumbai - 400025, IndiaSG
Offered Asset Classes & ServicesStock trading, futures and options trading, investment funds, bonds, insurance, etc.FX, CFDs and securities trading services
Execution Software & TerminalsProprietary / Web PlatformProprietary / Web Platform
Supported Client LanguagesEnglishEnglish
Warning / Exposure Count0 recorded warning(s)0 recorded warning(s)
Specialized Sub-Page Audits

Compare ICICIDirect and UTRADE against other regulated peers in our institutions licensed across asia-pacific and the middle east slice.

Frequently Asked Questions: ICICIDirect vs UTRADE

Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.

Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: ICICIDirect or UTRADE?

Both ICICIDirect and UTRADE hold 1 regulated licence record(s) in our dataset. Specifically, ICICIDirect maintains 1 total recorded filing(s) (SEBI) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas UTRADE maintains 1 recorded filing(s) (MAS) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.

How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between ICICIDirect and UTRADE?

In APAC Capital Brief's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), ICICIDirect records an Overall Score of 6.3 (Risk & Licensing: 6.3, Brand: 6.3, Market Influence: 6.3, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 3.0), compared with UTRADE at 5.0 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 5.0, Brand: 5.0, Market Influence: 5.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 3.0).

How do ICICIDirect and UTRADE differ in trading platforms and asset classes?

ICICIDirect lists Stock trading, futures and options trading, investment funds, bonds, insurance, etc. with execution software [proprietary/web execution], while UTRADE lists FX, CFDs and securities trading services with execution software [proprietary/web execution]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.

Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: ICICIDirect or UTRADE?

ICICIDirect carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while UTRADE carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).

Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.

ICICIDirect vs UTRADE (2026) — Regulation, 6D Score, Safety & Fee Comparison | APAC Capital Brief