1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison
Ignatic vs INF: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit
Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of Ignatic (Ignatica Limited) and INF (Infinitas Global Limited) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.
Coverage: Institutions licensed across Asia-Pacific and the Middle East
- Ignatic 6D Score
- 5.0
- INF 6D Score
- 5.0
- Regulated Licences
- 0 vs 0
- Warning Flags
- 0 vs 0
Ignatic and INF are statistically tied in composite 6D scoring (5.0 vs 5.0)
On supervisory breadth, Ignatic holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 0 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas INF holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 0 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.
6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison
Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).
| Evaluation Dimension | Methodology Weight | Ignatic | INF | Score Delta | Dimension Leader |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Composite 6D Score | 100% Composite | 5.0 | 5.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore) | 30% Weight | 5.0 | 5.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore) | 20% Weight | 3.0 | 3.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore) | 20% Weight | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore) | 15% Weight | 5.0 | 5.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore) | 15% Weight | 5.0 | 5.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
Visual Architecture Benchmark: Ignatic vs INF
Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.
Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison
Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.
| Audit Attribute | Ignatic | INF |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Legal Name | Ignatica Limited | Infinitas Global Limited |
| Source Risk Classification | Risk level not supplied | Risk level not supplied |
| Active Regulated / Total Filings | 0 regulated / 0 total (0 Tier-1) | 0 regulated / 0 total (0 Tier-1) |
| Recorded Certificate Numbers | None on file | None on file |
| Registered Domicile / Address | HK | Flat/Rm A, 12/F, ZJ 300, 300 Lockhart Road, Wan Chai, Hong Kong / ROOM E 21/F NEICH TOWER 128 GLOUCESTER RD,HONG KONG |
| Offered Asset Classes & Services | Multi-asset financial services | Multi-asset financial services |
| Execution Software & Terminals | Proprietary / Web Platform | MT4 |
| Supported Client Languages | English | Chinese (Simplified), Chinese (Traditional), Vietnamese, English, Japanese, Korean, Thai |
| Warning / Exposure Count | 0 recorded warning(s) | 0 recorded warning(s) |
| Specialized Sub-Page Audits |
Related 1v1 Institutional Comparisons
Compare Ignatic and INF against other regulated peers in our institutions licensed across asia-pacific and the middle east slice.
Frequently Asked Questions: Ignatic vs INF
Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.
Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: Ignatic or INF?
Both Ignatic and INF hold 0 regulated licence record(s) in our dataset. Specifically, Ignatic maintains 0 total recorded filing(s) (none on file) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas INF maintains 0 recorded filing(s) (none on file) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.
How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between Ignatic and INF?
In APAC Capital Brief's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), Ignatic records an Overall Score of 5.0 (Risk & Licensing: 5.0, Brand: 5.0, Market Influence: 5.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 3.0), compared with INF at 5.0 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 5.0, Brand: 5.0, Market Influence: 5.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 3.0).
How do Ignatic and INF differ in trading platforms and asset classes?
Ignatic lists general financial services with execution software [proprietary/web execution], while INF lists general financial services with execution software [MT4]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.
Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: Ignatic or INF?
Ignatic carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while INF carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).
Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.