1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison
Invast Global vs PFD: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit
Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of Invast Global (Invast Financial Services Pty Ltd) and PFD (Pacific Financial Derivatives Ltd) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.
Coverage: Institutions licensed across Asia-Pacific and the Middle East
- Invast Global 6D Score
- 6.0
- PFD 6D Score
- 6.0
- Regulated Licences
- 1 vs 1
- Warning Flags
- 0 vs 0
Invast Global and PFD are statistically tied in composite 6D scoring (6.0 vs 6.0)
On supervisory breadth, Invast Global holds 1 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 1 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas PFD holds 1 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 1 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.
6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison
Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).
| Evaluation Dimension | Methodology Weight | Invast Global | PFD | Score Delta | Dimension Leader |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Composite 6D Score | 100% Composite | 6.0 | 6.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore) | 30% Weight | 6.0 | 6.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore) | 20% Weight | 3.0 | 4.0 | +1.0 | PFD |
| User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore) | 20% Weight | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore) | 15% Weight | 6.0 | 5.0 | +1.0 | Invast Global |
| Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore) | 15% Weight | 6.0 | 5.0 | +1.0 | Invast Global |
Visual Architecture Benchmark: Invast Global vs PFD
Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.
Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison
Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.
| Audit Attribute | Invast Global | PFD |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Legal Name | Invast Financial Services Pty Ltd | Pacific Financial Derivatives Ltd |
| Source Risk Classification | Risk level not supplied | Risk level not supplied |
| Active Regulated / Total Filings | 1 regulated / 1 total (0 Tier-1) | 1 regulated / 1 total (0 Tier-1) |
| Recorded Certificate Numbers | ||
| Registered Domicile / Address | Level 27, Aurora Place, 88 Phillip Street, Sydney NSW 2000 KOYO BUILDING, 1-5-6, Higashi-Nihonbashi, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, Japan 103-0004 | Level 8, Swanson House,12- 26 Swanson St., Auckland Central 1010, New Zealand |
| Offered Asset Classes & Services | single-stock and ETF synthetic products, stock-algorithm suite, FX and precious metals, indices and commodities | Metals, spot crude oil, commodities, CFDs (Contracts for Difference), indices and futures CFD contracts. |
| Execution Software & Terminals | MT4, MT5 | MT4 |
| Supported Client Languages | English | English |
| Warning / Exposure Count | 0 recorded warning(s) | 0 recorded warning(s) |
| Specialized Sub-Page Audits |
Related 1v1 Institutional Comparisons
Compare Invast Global and PFD against other regulated peers in our institutions licensed across asia-pacific and the middle east slice.
Frequently Asked Questions: Invast Global vs PFD
Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.
Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: Invast Global or PFD?
Both Invast Global and PFD hold 1 regulated licence record(s) in our dataset. Specifically, Invast Global maintains 1 total recorded filing(s) (ASIC) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas PFD maintains 1 recorded filing(s) (FMA) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.
How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between Invast Global and PFD?
In APAC Capital Brief's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), Invast Global records an Overall Score of 6.0 (Risk & Licensing: 6.0, Brand: 6.0, Market Influence: 6.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 3.0), compared with PFD at 6.0 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 6.0, Brand: 5.0, Market Influence: 5.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 4.0).
How do Invast Global and PFD differ in trading platforms and asset classes?
Invast Global lists single-stock and ETF synthetic products, stock-algorithm suite, FX and precious metals, indices and commodities with execution software [MT4, MT5], while PFD lists Metals, spot crude oil, commodities, CFDs (Contracts for Difference), indices and futures CFD contracts. with execution software [MT4]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.
Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: Invast Global or PFD?
Invast Global carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while PFD carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).
Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.