1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison
KULAP vs Liminal: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit
Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of KULAP (Satoshi Co., Ltd.) and Liminal (Liminal Custody Solutions) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.
Coverage: Institutions licensed across Asia-Pacific and the Middle East
- KULAP 6D Score
- 5.0
- Liminal 6D Score
- 5.0
- Regulated Licences
- 0 vs 0
- Warning Flags
- 0 vs 0
KULAP and Liminal are statistically tied in composite 6D scoring (5.0 vs 5.0)
On supervisory breadth, KULAP holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 0 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas Liminal holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 0 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.
6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison
Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).
| Evaluation Dimension | Methodology Weight | KULAP | Liminal | Score Delta | Dimension Leader |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Composite 6D Score | 100% Composite | 5.0 | 5.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore) | 30% Weight | 5.0 | 5.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore) | 20% Weight | 3.0 | 3.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore) | 20% Weight | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore) | 15% Weight | 5.0 | 5.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore) | 15% Weight | 5.0 | 5.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
Visual Architecture Benchmark: KULAP vs Liminal
Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.
Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison
Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.
| Audit Attribute | KULAP | Liminal |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Legal Name | Satoshi Co., Ltd. | Liminal Custody Solutions |
| Source Risk Classification | Risk level not supplied | Risk level not supplied |
| Active Regulated / Total Filings | 0 regulated / 0 total (0 Tier-1) | 0 regulated / 0 total (0 Tier-1) |
| Recorded Certificate Numbers | None on file | None on file |
| Registered Domicile / Address | Silom Road, Bangrak, Bangkok 10500, Thailand | SG |
| Offered Asset Classes & Services | Multi-asset financial services | Multi-asset financial services |
| Execution Software & Terminals | Proprietary / Web Platform | Proprietary / Web Platform |
| Supported Client Languages | English | English |
| Warning / Exposure Count | 0 recorded warning(s) | 0 recorded warning(s) |
| Specialized Sub-Page Audits |
Related 1v1 Institutional Comparisons
Compare KULAP and Liminal against other regulated peers in our institutions licensed across asia-pacific and the middle east slice.
Frequently Asked Questions: KULAP vs Liminal
Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.
Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: KULAP or Liminal?
Both KULAP and Liminal hold 0 regulated licence record(s) in our dataset. Specifically, KULAP maintains 0 total recorded filing(s) (none on file) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas Liminal maintains 0 recorded filing(s) (none on file) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.
How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between KULAP and Liminal?
In APAC Capital Brief's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), KULAP records an Overall Score of 5.0 (Risk & Licensing: 5.0, Brand: 5.0, Market Influence: 5.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 3.0), compared with Liminal at 5.0 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 5.0, Brand: 5.0, Market Influence: 5.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 3.0).
How do KULAP and Liminal differ in trading platforms and asset classes?
KULAP lists general financial services with execution software [proprietary/web execution], while Liminal lists general financial services with execution software [proprietary/web execution]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.
Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: KULAP or Liminal?
KULAP carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while Liminal carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).
Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.