Skip to content
APAC Capital Brief
Directory

1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison

Mekness vs PGM: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit

Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of Mekness (Mekness Limited) and PGM (PGM) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.

Coverage: Institutions licensed across Asia-Pacific and the Middle East

Mekness 6D Score
5.0
PGM 6D Score
6.0
Regulated Licences
0 vs 1
Warning Flags
0 vs 0
DETERMINISTIC QUANTITATIVE VERDICTCanonical Pair: mekness-vs-pgm

PGM outranks Mekness by +1.0 pts in composite 6D scoring (6.0 vs 5.0)

On supervisory breadth, Mekness holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 0 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas PGM holds 1 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 1 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.

6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison

Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).

Evaluation DimensionMethodology WeightMeknessPGMScore DeltaDimension Leader
Overall Composite 6D Score100% Composite5.06.0+1.0PGM
Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore)30% Weight5.06.0+1.0PGM
Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore)20% Weight3.03.00.0Statistical Tie
User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore)20% Weight0.00.00.0Statistical Tie
Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore)15% Weight5.06.0+1.0PGM
Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore)15% Weight5.06.0+1.0PGM

Visual Architecture Benchmark: Mekness vs PGM

Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.

1v1 Institutional Counterparty Benchmark: Mekness vs PGM
Exhibit: Side-by-side regulatory and 6D quantitative comparison between Mekness and PGM.

Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison

Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.

Audit AttributeMeknessPGM
Primary Legal NameMekness LimitedPGM
Source Risk ClassificationRisk level not suppliedRisk level not supplied
Active Regulated / Total Filings0 regulated / 0 total (0 Tier-1)1 regulated / 1 total (0 Tier-1)
Recorded Certificate NumbersNone on file
Registered Domicile / AddressLot No. 20, Level 1, Lazenda Commercial Centre Phase 3, Jalan OKK Abdullah, 87000 Federal Territory of Labuan, MalaysiaINP MELBOURNE, Suite 103, 566 St kilda Road MELBOURNE VIC 3004
Offered Asset Classes & ServicesBorsa İstanbul Pay Piyasası trading, futures contracts, options contracts, FX CFDs, commodities, exchange-listed indices and related productsFX pairs, indices, commodities and precious metals
Execution Software & TerminalsProprietary / Web PlatformMT4, MT5
Supported Client LanguagesEnglishEnglish, Chinese, Japanese, Thai, Uyghur
Warning / Exposure Count0 recorded warning(s)0 recorded warning(s)
Specialized Sub-Page Audits

Compare Mekness and PGM against other regulated peers in our institutions licensed across asia-pacific and the middle east slice.

Frequently Asked Questions: Mekness vs PGM

Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.

Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: Mekness or PGM?

PGM holds more active regulated filings (1 vs 0). Specifically, Mekness maintains 0 total recorded filing(s) (none on file) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas PGM maintains 1 recorded filing(s) (ASIC) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.

How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between Mekness and PGM?

In APAC Capital Brief's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), Mekness records an Overall Score of 5.0 (Risk & Licensing: 5.0, Brand: 5.0, Market Influence: 5.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 3.0), compared with PGM at 6.0 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 6.0, Brand: 6.0, Market Influence: 6.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 3.0).

How do Mekness and PGM differ in trading platforms and asset classes?

Mekness lists Borsa İstanbul Pay Piyasası trading, futures contracts, options contracts, FX CFDs, commodities, exchange-listed indices and related products with execution software [proprietary/web execution], while PGM lists FX pairs, indices, commodities and precious metals with execution software [MT4, MT5]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.

Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: Mekness or PGM?

Mekness carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while PGM carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).

Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.

Mekness vs PGM (2026) — Regulation, 6D Score, Safety & Fee Comparison | APAC Capital Brief