1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison
Omise vs PGM: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit
Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of Omise (Omise) and PGM (PGM) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.
Coverage: Institutions licensed across Asia-Pacific and the Middle East
- Omise 6D Score
- 4.0
- PGM 6D Score
- 6.0
- Regulated Licences
- 1 vs 1
- Warning Flags
- 0 vs 0
PGM outranks Omise by +2.0 pts in composite 6D scoring (6.0 vs 4.0)
On supervisory breadth, Omise holds 1 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 1 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas PGM holds 1 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 1 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.
6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison
Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).
| Evaluation Dimension | Methodology Weight | Omise | PGM | Score Delta | Dimension Leader |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Composite 6D Score | 100% Composite | 4.0 | 6.0 | +2.0 | PGM |
| Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore) | 30% Weight | 4.0 | 6.0 | +2.0 | PGM |
| Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore) | 20% Weight | 3.0 | 3.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore) | 20% Weight | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore) | 15% Weight | 4.0 | 6.0 | +2.0 | PGM |
| Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore) | 15% Weight | 4.0 | 6.0 | +2.0 | PGM |
Visual Architecture Benchmark: Omise vs PGM
Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.
Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison
Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.
| Audit Attribute | Omise | PGM |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Legal Name | Omise | PGM |
| Source Risk Classification | Risk level not supplied | Risk level not supplied |
| Active Regulated / Total Filings | 1 regulated / 1 total (0 Tier-1) | 1 regulated / 1 total (0 Tier-1) |
| Recorded Certificate Numbers | ||
| Registered Domicile / Address | Crystal Design Center, 1448/4, J2 Building, Ladprao 87, Klongchan, Bangkapi, Bangkok 10240, Thailand | INP MELBOURNE, Suite 103, 566 St kilda Road MELBOURNE VIC 3004 |
| Offered Asset Classes & Services | Cross-border payment, electronic wallet | FX pairs, indices, commodities and precious metals |
| Execution Software & Terminals | Proprietary / Web Platform | MT4, MT5 |
| Supported Client Languages | English | English, Chinese, Japanese, Thai, Uyghur |
| Warning / Exposure Count | 0 recorded warning(s) | 0 recorded warning(s) |
| Specialized Sub-Page Audits |
Related 1v1 Institutional Comparisons
Compare Omise and PGM against other regulated peers in our institutions licensed across asia-pacific and the middle east slice.
Frequently Asked Questions: Omise vs PGM
Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.
Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: Omise or PGM?
Both Omise and PGM hold 1 regulated licence record(s) in our dataset. Specifically, Omise maintains 1 total recorded filing(s) (MAS) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas PGM maintains 1 recorded filing(s) (ASIC) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.
How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between Omise and PGM?
In APAC Capital Brief's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), Omise records an Overall Score of 4.0 (Risk & Licensing: 4.0, Brand: 4.0, Market Influence: 4.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 3.0), compared with PGM at 6.0 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 6.0, Brand: 6.0, Market Influence: 6.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 3.0).
How do Omise and PGM differ in trading platforms and asset classes?
Omise lists Cross-border payment, electronic wallet with execution software [proprietary/web execution], while PGM lists FX pairs, indices, commodities and precious metals with execution software [MT4, MT5]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.
Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: Omise or PGM?
Omise carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while PGM carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).
Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.