Skip to content
APAC Capital Brief
Directory

Institution record

Bitget

Risk level not supplied3 of 11 licences marked regulated
Source score
—
Warnings
0
Comments
0

Licence records

Licences within our coverage (institutions licensed across asia-pacific and the middle east) are listed first. Check each one on the regulator's own register.

RegulatorLicence no.StatusLicensed entityDate
Australian Securities and Investments Commission
640 030 084RegulatedAUS BITGET PTY LTD2020-03-30
Financial Transactions and Reports Analysis Centre of Canada (FINTRAC)
M20179708Exceeded scopeCANADA BITGET LIMITED2020-04-08
Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN)
31000163795967Exceeded scopeBITGET TECHNOLOGY GROUP LTD2020-02-25
Czech National Bank
Not suppliedRegisteredBTG Technology Holdings Limited2023
Comisión Nacional de Valores
Not suppliedRegisteredBTG Technology Holdings Limited2024
Financial Conduct Authority
838086RegulatedBTG Technology Holdings Limited2024
Organismo Agenti e Mediatori
Not suppliedRegisteredBTG Technology Holdings Limited2023
Central Reserve Bank of El Salvador (BCR)
Not suppliedRegulatedBTG Technology Holdings Limited2024
National Revenue Agency of Bulgaria (NRA)
Not suppliedRegisteredBTG Technology Holdings Limited2025
Financial Crime Investigation Service of Lithuania (FNTT / FCIS)
Not suppliedRegisteredBTG Technology Holdings Limited2023
Polish Financial Supervision Authority (KNF)
Not suppliedRegisteredBTG Technology Holdings Limited2023

Peer regulatory & risk comparison

Side-by-side supervisory and risk benchmark comparing Bitget against peer institutions in our institutions licensed across asia-pacific and the middle east dataset.

Full directory →
InstitutionPrimary regulatorsRegulated / totalRisk classificationSource scoreWarnings
Bitget (this record)
ASICFinancial Transactions and Reports Analysis Centre of Canada (FINTRAC)Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN)+8
3 / 11Risk level not supplied—0
ASIC
1 / 1Risk level not supplied6.00
ASIC
1 / 1Risk level not supplied6.00
ASIC
1 / 1Risk level not supplied6.00
ASIC
0 / 1Risk level not supplied6.00
ASIC
1 / 1Risk level not supplied6.00

Bitget: institutional due diligence FAQ

Key supervisory, licensing, and counterparty verification questions generated from the dataset.

What is Bitget's regulatory licence status and supervisory authorisation?

In our imported dataset, Bitget (legal entity reference: Bitget) holds 11 recorded licence entries, of which 3 carry a "regulated" status and 9 are marked regulated or registered: ASIC (Australian Securities and Investments Commission) — licence 640 030 084, status: regulated; Financial Transactions and Reports Analysis Centre of Canada (FINTRAC) — licence M20179708, status: exceeded scope; Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) — licence 31000163795967, status: exceeded scope; CNB (Czech National Bank) — licence Not supplied, status: registered; CNV (Comisión Nacional de Valores) — licence Not supplied, status: registered; Financial Conduct Authority — licence 838086, status: regulated; OAM (Organismo Agenti e Mediatori) — licence Not supplied, status: registered; Central Reserve Bank of El Salvador (BCR) — licence Not supplied, status: regulated; National Revenue Agency of Bulgaria (NRA) — licence Not supplied, status: registered; Financial Crime Investigation Service of Lithuania (FNTT / FCIS) — licence Not supplied, status: registered; Polish Financial Supervision Authority (KNF) — licence Not supplied, status: registered. Institutional due diligence requires verifying that the exact legal entity on your counterparty agreement matches the licensed entity name and registration number on the official ASIC, Financial Transactions and Reports Analysis Centre of Canada (FINTRAC), Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) public register.

Which of Bitget's jurisdictions and licences fall within this site's regulatory coverage?

Bitget is registered at SINGAPORE BITGET PTE. LTD. and tracked under our institutions licensed across asia-pacific and the middle east scope based on its institutional service profile (multi-asset financial services) rather than a domestic focus licence. Its 11 recorded licences (ASIC, Financial Transactions and Reports Analysis Centre of Canada (FINTRAC), Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN), CNB, CNV, Financial Conduct Authority, OAM, Central Reserve Bank of El Salvador (BCR), National Revenue Agency of Bulgaria (NRA), Financial Crime Investigation Service of Lithuania (FNTT / FCIS), Polish Financial Supervision Authority (KNF)) should be evaluated for cross-border passporting and local solicitation rules.

What is Bitget's institutional risk classification, enforcement exposure, and score profile?

Bitget carries a "risk level not supplied" classification in the source dataset (composite numeric scores are not supplied for this record). The record flags 0 regulatory warning or complaint counts and 2 licence records with elevated status flags (Financial Transactions and Reports Analysis Centre of Canada (FINTRAC): exceeded scope, Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN): exceeded scope). Because these figures reflect imported source fields rather than primary audit findings, compliance teams should review primary enforcement bulletins directly.

What operational due diligence steps apply to Bitget's platforms, entity structure, and complaints?

Before allocating capital or executing trades with Bitget, institutional and retail allocators should: (1) confirm the domain (not supplied in source) against regulator-approved domains to guard against clone firms; (2) verify whether any of the 0 recorded warning/complaint entries or 0 user comments involve withdrawal restrictions or scope violations; and (3) confirm the dispute-resolution ombudsman tied to ASIC.

Editorial briefings and compliance research from APAC Capital Brief relevant to Bitget's supervisory scope.

All research →

APAC Markets

APAC Cross-Border Capital Connect & MAS/SFC Licensing Brief: 2026 Definitive Institutional Guide, Quantitative Benchmarks & Regulatory Audit

Definitive 2026 flagship cornerstone guide to APAC Cross-Border Capital Connect & MAS/SFC Licensing Brief on APAC Capital Brief (apaccapitalbrief.com). Covers Singapore MAS / Hong Kong SFC & HKMA / ASIC / BoJ statutory rules, Tier-1 quantitative benchmarks, mathematical formulation (APAC-MAS-SFC-CONNECT), and compliance verification.

Read briefing →

APAC Regulatory & Capital Corridors

APAC Institutional Capital Corridors in 2026: Comparative Licensing, Capital Adequacy, and Cross-Border Settlement Across MAS, HKMA/SFC, JFSA, ASIC, and India GIFT City IFSCA

An institutional Asia-Pacific dispatch analyzing statutory licensing thresholds, base capital and liquid capital mandates, client money trust segregation, and digital-asset/derivatives execution corridors across Singapore (MAS), Hong Kong (SFC/HKMA), Japan (JFSA), Australia (ASIC), and India GIFT City (IFSCA).

Read briefing →

regulatory-compliance

Solana’s Shanghai event halted over unauthorized promotion: Report

Solana’s Shanghai event halted over unauthorized promotion: Report: Solana’s promotional campaigns through domestic entities allegedly violated China’s crypto-related restrictions, an unidentified PBOC official told Ch

Read briefing →

monetary-policy

Japanese Government Bonds Held by the Bank of Japan

Japanese Government Bonds Held by the Bank of Japan: Institutional summary of the supplied primary disclosure. Cross-reference official supervisory registers for live updates.

Read briefing →
Bitget — Regulation, Licence Records & Risk Profile | APAC Capital Brief