Institution record
RelayPay
- Source score
- 2.0
- Warnings
- 0
- Comments
- 0
Licence records
Licences within our coverage (institutions licensed across asia-pacific and the middle east) are listed first. Check each one on the regulator's own register.
| Regulator | Licence no. | Status | Licensed entity | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
In our coverage Australian Securities and Investments Commission | 001305063 | Regulated | RelayPay | — |
Peer regulatory & risk comparison
Side-by-side supervisory and risk benchmark comparing RelayPay against peer institutions in our institutions licensed across asia-pacific and the middle east dataset.
| Institution | Primary regulators | Regulated / total | Risk classification | Source score | Warnings |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RelayPay (this record) | ASIC | 1 / 1 | Risk level not supplied | 2.0 | 0 |
ASIC | 1 / 1 | Risk level not supplied | 6.0 | 0 | |
ASIC | 1 / 1 | Risk level not supplied | 6.0 | 0 | |
ASIC | 1 / 1 | Risk level not supplied | 6.0 | 0 | |
ASIC | 0 / 1 | Risk level not supplied | 6.0 | 0 | |
ASIC | 1 / 1 | Risk level not supplied | 6.0 | 0 |
RelayPay: institutional due diligence FAQ
Key supervisory, licensing, and counterparty verification questions generated from the dataset.
What is RelayPay's regulatory licence status and supervisory authorisation?
In our imported dataset, RelayPay (legal entity reference: RelayPay) holds 1 recorded licence entry, of which 1 carries a "regulated" status and 1 are marked regulated or registered: ASIC (Australian Securities and Investments Commission) — licence 001305063, status: regulated. Institutional due diligence requires verifying that the exact legal entity on your counterparty agreement matches the licensed entity name and registration number on the official ASIC public register.
Which of RelayPay's jurisdictions and licences fall within this site's regulatory coverage?
This directory focuses on institutions licensed across asia-pacific and the middle east. 1 of RelayPay's 1 licence records fall directly within this jurisdictional mandate: ASIC (licence 001305063, regulated, entity: RelayPay). Always confirm whether client money segregation and statutory investor compensation schemes apply to the specific subsidiary onboarding your account.
What is RelayPay's institutional risk classification, enforcement exposure, and score profile?
RelayPay carries a "risk level not supplied" classification in the source dataset, alongside composite 5-dimension ratings out of 10 (overall: 2.0, risk & licensing: 2.0, brand: 2.0, market influence: 2.0, user reputation: 0.0). The record flags 0 regulatory warning or complaint counts. Because these figures reflect imported source fields rather than primary audit findings, compliance teams should review primary enforcement bulletins directly.
What operational due diligence steps apply to RelayPay's platforms, entity structure, and complaints?
Before allocating capital or executing trades with RelayPay, institutional and retail allocators should: (1) confirm the domain (relaypay.io) against regulator-approved domains to guard against clone firms; (2) verify whether any of the 0 recorded warning/complaint entries or 0 user comments involve withdrawal restrictions or scope violations; and (3) confirm the dispute-resolution ombudsman tied to ASIC.
Related institutional research & regulatory analysis
Editorial briefings and compliance research from APAC Capital Brief relevant to RelayPay's supervisory scope.
APAC Markets
APAC Cross-Border Capital Connect & MAS/SFC Licensing Brief: 2026 Definitive Institutional Guide, Quantitative Benchmarks & Regulatory Audit
Definitive 2026 flagship cornerstone guide to APAC Cross-Border Capital Connect & MAS/SFC Licensing Brief on APAC Capital Brief (apaccapitalbrief.com). Covers Singapore MAS / Hong Kong SFC & HKMA / ASIC / BoJ statutory rules, Tier-1 quantitative benchmarks, mathematical formulation (APAC-MAS-SFC-CONNECT), and compliance verification.
APAC Regulatory & Capital Corridors
APAC Institutional Capital Corridors in 2026: Comparative Licensing, Capital Adequacy, and Cross-Border Settlement Across MAS, HKMA/SFC, JFSA, ASIC, and India GIFT City IFSCA
An institutional Asia-Pacific dispatch analyzing statutory licensing thresholds, base capital and liquid capital mandates, client money trust segregation, and digital-asset/derivatives execution corridors across Singapore (MAS), Hong Kong (SFC/HKMA), Japan (JFSA), Australia (ASIC), and India GIFT City (IFSCA).
regulatory-compliance
Solana’s Shanghai event halted over unauthorized promotion: Report
Solana’s Shanghai event halted over unauthorized promotion: Report: Solana’s promotional campaigns through domestic entities allegedly violated China’s crypto-related restrictions, an unidentified PBOC official told Ch
monetary-policy
Japanese Government Bonds Held by the Bank of Japan
Japanese Government Bonds Held by the Bank of Japan: Institutional summary of the supplied primary disclosure. Cross-reference official supervisory registers for live updates.