1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison
1109 Prosper Company Limited vs Z.com EX: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit
Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of 1109 Prosper Company Limited (1109 Prosper Company Limited) and Z.com EX (GMO-Z.com Cryptonomics (Thailand) Co., Ltd.) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.
Coverage: Institutions licensed across Asia-Pacific and the Middle East
- 1109 Prosper Company Limited 6D Score
- 4.0
- Z.com EX 6D Score
- 5.0
- Regulated Licences
- 0 vs 1
- Warning Flags
- 0 vs 0
Z.com EX outranks 1109 Prosper Company Limited by +1.0 pts in composite 6D scoring (5.0 vs 4.0)
On supervisory breadth, 1109 Prosper Company Limited holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 1 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas Z.com EX holds 1 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 1 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.
6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison
Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).
| Evaluation Dimension | Methodology Weight | 1109 Prosper Company Limited | Z.com EX | Score Delta | Dimension Leader |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Composite 6D Score | 100% Composite | 4.0 | 5.0 | +1.0 | Z.com EX |
| Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore) | 30% Weight | 4.0 | 5.0 | +1.0 | Z.com EX |
| Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore) | 20% Weight | 2.0 | 3.0 | +1.0 | Z.com EX |
| User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore) | 20% Weight | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore) | 15% Weight | 4.0 | 5.0 | +1.0 | Z.com EX |
| Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore) | 15% Weight | 4.0 | 5.0 | +1.0 | Z.com EX |
Visual Architecture Benchmark: 1109 Prosper Company Limited vs Z.com EX
Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.
Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison
Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.
| Audit Attribute | 1109 Prosper Company Limited | Z.com EX |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Legal Name | 1109 Prosper Company Limited | GMO-Z.com Cryptonomics (Thailand) Co., Ltd. |
| Source Risk Classification | Risk level not supplied | Risk level not supplied |
| Active Regulated / Total Filings | 0 regulated / 1 total (0 Tier-1) | 1 regulated / 1 total (0 Tier-1) |
| Recorded Certificate Numbers | ||
| Registered Domicile / Address | 1047Silom Road, Silom Subdistrict, Bangrak District, Bangkok 10500 | 1 Fortune Town, 22nd Floor, Din Daeng District, Bangkok City 10400, TH |
| Offered Asset Classes & Services | Multi-asset financial services | Multi-asset financial services |
| Execution Software & Terminals | Proprietary / Web Platform | Proprietary / Web Platform |
| Supported Client Languages | English | English |
| Warning / Exposure Count | 0 recorded warning(s) | 0 recorded warning(s) |
| Specialized Sub-Page Audits |
Related 1v1 Institutional Comparisons
Compare 1109 Prosper Company Limited and Z.com EX against other regulated peers in our institutions licensed across asia-pacific and the middle east slice.
Frequently Asked Questions: 1109 Prosper Company Limited vs Z.com EX
Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.
Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: 1109 Prosper Company Limited or Z.com EX?
Z.com EX holds more active regulated filings (1 vs 0). Specifically, 1109 Prosper Company Limited maintains 1 total recorded filing(s) (SEC) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas Z.com EX maintains 1 recorded filing(s) (SEC) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.
How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between 1109 Prosper Company Limited and Z.com EX?
In APAC Capital Brief's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), 1109 Prosper Company Limited records an Overall Score of 4.0 (Risk & Licensing: 4.0, Brand: 4.0, Market Influence: 4.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 2.0), compared with Z.com EX at 5.0 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 5.0, Brand: 5.0, Market Influence: 5.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 3.0).
How do 1109 Prosper Company Limited and Z.com EX differ in trading platforms and asset classes?
1109 Prosper Company Limited lists general financial services with execution software [proprietary/web execution], while Z.com EX lists general financial services with execution software [proprietary/web execution]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.
Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: 1109 Prosper Company Limited or Z.com EX?
1109 Prosper Company Limited carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while Z.com EX carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).
Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.