1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison
Abullion vs Hai Cloud Exchange: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit
Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of Abullion (Abullion) and Hai Cloud Exchange (Hai Cloud Exchange) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.
Coverage: Institutions licensed across Asia-Pacific and the Middle East
- Abullion 6D Score
- 5.0
- Hai Cloud Exchange 6D Score
- 5.0
- Regulated Licences
- 0 vs 1
- Warning Flags
- 0 vs 0
Abullion and Hai Cloud Exchange are statistically tied in composite 6D scoring (5.0 vs 5.0)
On supervisory breadth, Abullion holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 0 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas Hai Cloud Exchange holds 1 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 1 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.
6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison
Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).
| Evaluation Dimension | Methodology Weight | Abullion | Hai Cloud Exchange | Score Delta | Dimension Leader |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Composite 6D Score | 100% Composite | 5.0 | 5.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore) | 30% Weight | 5.0 | 6.0 | +1.0 | Hai Cloud Exchange |
| Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore) | 20% Weight | 3.0 | 4.0 | +1.0 | Hai Cloud Exchange |
| User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore) | 20% Weight | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore) | 15% Weight | 5.0 | 5.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore) | 15% Weight | 5.0 | 6.0 | +1.0 | Hai Cloud Exchange |
Visual Architecture Benchmark: Abullion vs Hai Cloud Exchange
Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.
Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison
Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.
| Audit Attribute | Abullion | Hai Cloud Exchange |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Legal Name | Abullion | Hai Cloud Exchange |
| Source Risk Classification | Risk level not supplied | Risk level not supplied |
| Active Regulated / Total Filings | 0 regulated / 0 total (0 Tier-1) | 1 regulated / 1 total (0 Tier-1) |
| Recorded Certificate Numbers | None on file | |
| Registered Domicile / Address | Hong Kong Queen’s Road Central 183 COSCO Tower 9/F | Room 1901, 19/F The Sun’s Group Centre, No. 200 Gloucester Road, Wanchai, Hong Kong SAR, China |
| Offered Asset Classes & Services | Gold | Foreign exchange, spot, forwards, swaps, options and structured products |
| Execution Software & Terminals | Proprietary / Web Platform | Proprietary / Web Platform |
| Supported Client Languages | English | Chinese, English |
| Warning / Exposure Count | 0 recorded warning(s) | 0 recorded warning(s) |
| Specialized Sub-Page Audits |
Related 1v1 Institutional Comparisons
Compare Abullion and Hai Cloud Exchange against other regulated peers in our institutions licensed across asia-pacific and the middle east slice.
Frequently Asked Questions: Abullion vs Hai Cloud Exchange
Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.
Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: Abullion or Hai Cloud Exchange?
Hai Cloud Exchange holds more active regulated filings (1 vs 0). Specifically, Abullion maintains 0 total recorded filing(s) (none on file) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas Hai Cloud Exchange maintains 1 recorded filing(s) (SFC) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.
How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between Abullion and Hai Cloud Exchange?
In APAC Capital Brief's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), Abullion records an Overall Score of 5.0 (Risk & Licensing: 5.0, Brand: 5.0, Market Influence: 5.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 3.0), compared with Hai Cloud Exchange at 5.0 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 6.0, Brand: 5.0, Market Influence: 6.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 4.0).
How do Abullion and Hai Cloud Exchange differ in trading platforms and asset classes?
Abullion lists Gold with execution software [proprietary/web execution], while Hai Cloud Exchange lists Foreign exchange, spot, forwards, swaps, options and structured products with execution software [proprietary/web execution]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.
Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: Abullion or Hai Cloud Exchange?
Abullion carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while Hai Cloud Exchange carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).
Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.