1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison
Ace Markets vs GDA Fund: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit
Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of Ace Markets (Ace Markets group) and GDA Fund (GDA Fund) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.
Coverage: Selected institution records: Asia-Pacific and the Middle East
- Ace Markets 6D Score
- 1.0
- GDA Fund 6D Score
- 5.0
- Regulated Licences
- 0 vs 0
- Warning Flags
- 0 vs 0
GDA Fund outranks Ace Markets by +4.0 pts in composite 6D scoring (5.0 vs 1.0)
On supervisory breadth, Ace Markets holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 0 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas GDA Fund holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 0 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.
6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison
Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).
| Evaluation Dimension | Methodology Weight | Ace Markets | GDA Fund | Score Delta | Dimension Leader |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Composite 6D Score | 100% Composite | 1.0 | 5.0 | +4.0 | GDA Fund |
| Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore) | 30% Weight | 1.0 | 5.0 | +4.0 | GDA Fund |
| Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore) | 20% Weight | 1.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore) | 20% Weight | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore) | 15% Weight | 1.0 | 5.0 | +4.0 | GDA Fund |
| Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore) | 15% Weight | 1.0 | 5.0 | +4.0 | GDA Fund |
Visual Architecture Benchmark: Ace Markets vs GDA Fund
Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.
Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison
Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.
| Audit Attribute | Ace Markets | GDA Fund |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Legal Name | Ace Markets group | GDA Fund |
| Source Risk Classification | Risk level not supplied | Risk level not supplied |
| Active Regulated / Total Filings | 0 regulated / 0 total (0 Tier-1) | 0 regulated / 0 total (0 Tier-1) |
| Recorded Certificate Numbers | None on file | None on file |
| Registered Domicile / Address | Level 41, Emirates Towers, Sheikh Zayed Road, Dubai, UAE | AE |
| Offered Asset Classes & Services | Forex | Multi-asset financial services |
| Execution Software & Terminals | Proprietary / Web Platform | Proprietary / Web Platform |
| Supported Client Languages | English | English |
| Warning / Exposure Count | 0 recorded warning(s) | 0 recorded warning(s) |
| Specialized Sub-Page Audits |
Related 1v1 Institutional Comparisons
Compare Ace Markets and GDA Fund against other regulated peers in our selected institution records: asia-pacific and the middle east slice.
Frequently Asked Questions: Ace Markets vs GDA Fund
Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.
Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: Ace Markets or GDA Fund?
Both Ace Markets and GDA Fund hold 0 regulated licence record(s) in our dataset. Specifically, Ace Markets maintains 0 total recorded filing(s) (none on file) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas GDA Fund maintains 0 recorded filing(s) (none on file) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.
How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between Ace Markets and GDA Fund?
In APAC Capital Brief's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), Ace Markets records an Overall Score of 1.0 (Risk & Licensing: 1.0, Brand: 1.0, Market Influence: 1.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 1.0), compared with GDA Fund at 5.0 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 5.0, Brand: 5.0, Market Influence: 5.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 1.0).
How do Ace Markets and GDA Fund differ in trading platforms and asset classes?
Ace Markets lists Forex with execution software [proprietary/web execution], while GDA Fund lists general financial services with execution software [proprietary/web execution]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.
Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: Ace Markets or GDA Fund?
Ace Markets carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while GDA Fund carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).
Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.