1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison
Aizawa Securities vs Tickmill: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit
Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of Aizawa Securities (Aizawa Securities Co., Ltd.) and Tickmill (Tickmill UK Limited) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.
Coverage: Selected institution records: Asia-Pacific and the Middle East
- Aizawa Securities 6D Score
- 7.0
- Tickmill 6D Score
- 7.0
- Regulated Licences
- 1 vs 4
- Warning Flags
- 0 vs 1
Aizawa Securities and Tickmill are statistically tied in composite 6D scoring (7.0 vs 7.0)
On supervisory breadth, Aizawa Securities holds 1 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 1 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas Tickmill holds 4 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 4 total filings and 1 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.
6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison
Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).
| Evaluation Dimension | Methodology Weight | Aizawa Securities | Tickmill | Score Delta | Dimension Leader |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Composite 6D Score | 100% Composite | 7.0 | 7.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore) | 30% Weight | 7.0 | 7.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore) | 20% Weight | 4.0 | 4.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore) | 20% Weight | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore) | 15% Weight | 7.0 | 8.0 | +1.0 | Tickmill |
| Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore) | 15% Weight | 7.0 | 7.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
Visual Architecture Benchmark: Aizawa Securities vs Tickmill
Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.
Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison
Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.
| Audit Attribute | Aizawa Securities | Tickmill |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Legal Name | Aizawa Securities Co., Ltd. | Tickmill UK Limited |
| Source Risk Classification | Risk level not supplied | Risk level not supplied |
| Active Regulated / Total Filings | 1 regulated / 1 total (0 Tier-1) | 4 regulated / 4 total (0 Tier-1) |
| Recorded Certificate Numbers | ||
| Registered Domicile / Address | 1-9-1 Higashi-Shimbashi, Minato-ku, Tokyo Shiodome Building, Tokyo 105-7307 | 3rd Floor, 27 - 32 Old Jewry, London EC2R 8DQ, England |
| Offered Asset Classes & Services | domestic stocks, Asia stocks, US and Europe stocks, investment trusts, bonds, ETF, ETN and REIT, packaging services, new products information | Foreign exchange, precious metals, crude oil, stock index |
| Execution Software & Terminals | Proprietary / Web Platform | MT4, MT5 |
| Supported Client Languages | English, Japanese | Chinese (Simplified), English, Italian, Polish, Malay and languages of other countries or regions |
| Warning / Exposure Count | 0 recorded warning(s) | 1 recorded warning(s) |
| Specialized Sub-Page Audits |
Related 1v1 Institutional Comparisons
Compare Aizawa Securities and Tickmill against other regulated peers in our selected institution records: asia-pacific and the middle east slice.
Frequently Asked Questions: Aizawa Securities vs Tickmill
Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.
Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: Aizawa Securities or Tickmill?
Tickmill holds more active regulated filings (4 vs 1). Specifically, Aizawa Securities maintains 1 total recorded filing(s) (FSA) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas Tickmill maintains 4 recorded filing(s) (Financial Conduct Authority, FSCA, CYSEC, Financial Services Authority Seychelles) with 1 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.
How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between Aizawa Securities and Tickmill?
In APAC Capital Brief's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), Aizawa Securities records an Overall Score of 7.0 (Risk & Licensing: 7.0, Brand: 7.0, Market Influence: 7.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 4.0), compared with Tickmill at 7.0 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 7.0, Brand: 8.0, Market Influence: 7.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 4.0).
How do Aizawa Securities and Tickmill differ in trading platforms and asset classes?
Aizawa Securities lists domestic stocks, Asia stocks, US and Europe stocks, investment trusts, bonds, ETF, ETN and REIT, packaging services, new products information with execution software [proprietary/web execution], while Tickmill lists Foreign exchange, precious metals, crude oil, stock index with execution software [MT4, MT5]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.
Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: Aizawa Securities or Tickmill?
Aizawa Securities carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while Tickmill carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 1 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).
Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.