1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison
CFD Capital vs YAIBrokers: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit
Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of CFD Capital (CFD Capital Limited) and YAIBrokers (YAIBrokers) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.
Coverage: Selected institution records: Asia-Pacific and the Middle East
- CFD Capital 6D Score
- 2.0
- YAIBrokers 6D Score
- 2.5
- Regulated Licences
- 0 vs 0
- Warning Flags
- 0 vs 0
YAIBrokers outranks CFD Capital by +0.5 pts in composite 6D scoring (2.5 vs 2.0)
On supervisory breadth, CFD Capital holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 0 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas YAIBrokers holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 1 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.
6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison
Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).
| Evaluation Dimension | Methodology Weight | CFD Capital | YAIBrokers | Score Delta | Dimension Leader |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Composite 6D Score | 100% Composite | 2.0 | 2.5 | +0.5 | YAIBrokers |
| Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore) | 30% Weight | 2.0 | 2.5 | +0.5 | YAIBrokers |
| Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore) | 20% Weight | 1.0 | 2.0 | +1.0 | YAIBrokers |
| User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore) | 20% Weight | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore) | 15% Weight | 2.0 | 2.5 | +0.5 | YAIBrokers |
| Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore) | 15% Weight | 2.0 | 2.5 | +0.5 | YAIBrokers |
Visual Architecture Benchmark: CFD Capital vs YAIBrokers
Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.
Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison
Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.
| Audit Attribute | CFD Capital | YAIBrokers |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Legal Name | CFD Capital Limited | YAIBrokers |
| Source Risk Classification | Risk level not supplied | Risk level not supplied |
| Active Regulated / Total Filings | 0 regulated / 0 total (0 Tier-1) | 0 regulated / 1 total (0 Tier-1) |
| Recorded Certificate Numbers | None on file | |
| Registered Domicile / Address | Morgan Tower, 22nd Floor, Street Koh Pich, Tonle Bassac, Chamkarmorn, Phnom Penh, Cambodia. Room 508, Golden Tower, Street 215, Sangkat Veal Vong, Khan 7 Makara, Phnom Penh, Cambodia | 1st Floor, Frist St. Vincent Bank Ltd Building, Jame Street, Kingstown, VC, Saint Vincent & Grenadines. 439 University Avenue, Toronto, Canada |
| Offered Asset Classes & Services | FX, commodities, indices, CFDs trading | FX, indices, energy, precious metals, cryptocurrencies and related services |
| Execution Software & Terminals | MT5 | MT5 |
| Supported Client Languages | English | English |
| Warning / Exposure Count | 0 recorded warning(s) | 0 recorded warning(s) |
| Specialized Sub-Page Audits |
Related 1v1 Institutional Comparisons
Compare CFD Capital and YAIBrokers against other regulated peers in our selected institution records: asia-pacific and the middle east slice.
Frequently Asked Questions: CFD Capital vs YAIBrokers
Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.
Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: CFD Capital or YAIBrokers?
Both CFD Capital and YAIBrokers hold 0 regulated licence record(s) in our dataset. Specifically, CFD Capital maintains 0 total recorded filing(s) (none on file) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas YAIBrokers maintains 1 recorded filing(s) (SERC) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.
How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between CFD Capital and YAIBrokers?
In APAC Capital Brief's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), CFD Capital records an Overall Score of 2.0 (Risk & Licensing: 2.0, Brand: 2.0, Market Influence: 2.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 1.0), compared with YAIBrokers at 2.5 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 2.5, Brand: 2.5, Market Influence: 2.5, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 2.0).
How do CFD Capital and YAIBrokers differ in trading platforms and asset classes?
CFD Capital lists FX, commodities, indices, CFDs trading with execution software [MT5], while YAIBrokers lists FX, indices, energy, precious metals, cryptocurrencies and related services with execution software [MT5]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.
Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: CFD Capital or YAIBrokers?
CFD Capital carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while YAIBrokers carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).
Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.