1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison
Coinbama vs D'CENT Wallet: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit
Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of Coinbama (Coinbama) and D'CENT Wallet (D'CENT Wallet) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.
Coverage: Selected institution records: Asia-Pacific and the Middle East
- Coinbama 6D Score
- 3.0
- D'CENT Wallet 6D Score
- 3.0
- Regulated Licences
- 0 vs 0
- Warning Flags
- 0 vs 0
Coinbama and D'CENT Wallet are statistically tied in composite 6D scoring (3.0 vs 3.0)
On supervisory breadth, Coinbama holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 0 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas D'CENT Wallet holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 0 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.
6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison
Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).
| Evaluation Dimension | Methodology Weight | Coinbama | D'CENT Wallet | Score Delta | Dimension Leader |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Composite 6D Score | 100% Composite | 3.0 | 3.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore) | 30% Weight | 1.0 | 3.0 | +2.0 | D'CENT Wallet |
| Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore) | 20% Weight | 1.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore) | 20% Weight | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore) | 15% Weight | 1.0 | 3.0 | +2.0 | D'CENT Wallet |
| Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore) | 15% Weight | 1.0 | 3.0 | +2.0 | D'CENT Wallet |
Visual Architecture Benchmark: Coinbama vs D'CENT Wallet
Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.
Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison
Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.
| Audit Attribute | Coinbama | D'CENT Wallet |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Legal Name | Coinbama | D'CENT Wallet |
| Source Risk Classification | Risk level not supplied | Risk level not supplied |
| Active Regulated / Total Filings | 0 regulated / 0 total (0 Tier-1) | 0 regulated / 0 total (0 Tier-1) |
| Recorded Certificate Numbers | None on file | None on file |
| Registered Domicile / Address | HK | 7th floor, Samsungdang Building, 747, Seolleung-ro, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, 06056, South Korea |
| Offered Asset Classes & Services | Multi-asset financial services | Transfers, cryptocurrencies, software wallets, card-based hardware wallets |
| Execution Software & Terminals | Proprietary / Web Platform | Proprietary / Web Platform |
| Supported Client Languages | English | Spanish, Japanese, Chinese, English, Korean |
| Warning / Exposure Count | 0 recorded warning(s) | 0 recorded warning(s) |
| Specialized Sub-Page Audits |
Related 1v1 Institutional Comparisons
Compare Coinbama and D'CENT Wallet against other regulated peers in our selected institution records: asia-pacific and the middle east slice.
Frequently Asked Questions: Coinbama vs D'CENT Wallet
Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.
Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: Coinbama or D'CENT Wallet?
Both Coinbama and D'CENT Wallet hold 0 regulated licence record(s) in our dataset. Specifically, Coinbama maintains 0 total recorded filing(s) (none on file) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas D'CENT Wallet maintains 0 recorded filing(s) (none on file) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.
How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between Coinbama and D'CENT Wallet?
In APAC Capital Brief's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), Coinbama records an Overall Score of 3.0 (Risk & Licensing: 1.0, Brand: 1.0, Market Influence: 1.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 1.0), compared with D'CENT Wallet at 3.0 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 3.0, Brand: 3.0, Market Influence: 3.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 1.0).
How do Coinbama and D'CENT Wallet differ in trading platforms and asset classes?
Coinbama lists general financial services with execution software [proprietary/web execution], while D'CENT Wallet lists Transfers, cryptocurrencies, software wallets, card-based hardware wallets with execution software [proprietary/web execution]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.
Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: Coinbama or D'CENT Wallet?
Coinbama carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while D'CENT Wallet carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).
Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.