1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison
Decode Capital vs FAIR MARKETS: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit
Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of Decode Capital (Decode Capital Pty Ltd) and FAIR MARKETS (FairMarkets Trading Pty Ltd) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.
Coverage: Selected institution records: Asia-Pacific and the Middle East
- Decode Capital 6D Score
- 2.0
- FAIR MARKETS 6D Score
- 6.0
- Regulated Licences
- 1 vs 1
- Warning Flags
- 0 vs 0
FAIR MARKETS outranks Decode Capital by +4.0 pts in composite 6D scoring (6.0 vs 2.0)
On supervisory breadth, Decode Capital holds 1 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 1 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas FAIR MARKETS holds 1 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 1 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.
6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison
Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).
| Evaluation Dimension | Methodology Weight | Decode Capital | FAIR MARKETS | Score Delta | Dimension Leader |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Composite 6D Score | 100% Composite | 2.0 | 6.0 | +4.0 | FAIR MARKETS |
| Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore) | 30% Weight | 2.0 | 4.0 | +2.0 | FAIR MARKETS |
| Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore) | 20% Weight | 1.0 | 4.0 | +3.0 | FAIR MARKETS |
| User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore) | 20% Weight | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore) | 15% Weight | 2.0 | 5.0 | +3.0 | FAIR MARKETS |
| Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore) | 15% Weight | 2.0 | 6.0 | +4.0 | FAIR MARKETS |
Visual Architecture Benchmark: Decode Capital vs FAIR MARKETS
Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.
Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison
Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.
| Audit Attribute | Decode Capital | FAIR MARKETS |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Legal Name | Decode Capital Pty Ltd | FairMarkets Trading Pty Ltd |
| Source Risk Classification | Risk level not supplied | Risk level not supplied |
| Active Regulated / Total Filings | 1 regulated / 1 total (0 Tier-1) | 1 regulated / 1 total (0 Tier-1) |
| Recorded Certificate Numbers | ||
| Registered Domicile / Address | LEVEL 23, 111 Pacific Highway, NORTH SYDNEY NSW 2060 | Level 26, 1 Bligh St, Sydney NSW 2000, Australia The Cyberati Lounge, Ground Floor, Silicon Avenue 40 Cybercity, 72201 Ebene Republic of Mauritius |
| Offered Asset Classes & Services | CFDs, Indices, Forex, Commodities | products, stocks, FX, commodities, oil trading, silver trading, index CFDs |
| Execution Software & Terminals | MT4 | MT4, MT5 |
| Supported Client Languages | English | English, Chinese (Simplified), Chinese (Traditional), Tagalog, Vietnamese, Thai, Hindi |
| Warning / Exposure Count | 0 recorded warning(s) | 0 recorded warning(s) |
| Specialized Sub-Page Audits |
Related 1v1 Institutional Comparisons
Compare Decode Capital and FAIR MARKETS against other regulated peers in our selected institution records: asia-pacific and the middle east slice.
Frequently Asked Questions: Decode Capital vs FAIR MARKETS
Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.
Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: Decode Capital or FAIR MARKETS?
Both Decode Capital and FAIR MARKETS hold 1 regulated licence record(s) in our dataset. Specifically, Decode Capital maintains 1 total recorded filing(s) (ASIC) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas FAIR MARKETS maintains 1 recorded filing(s) (ASIC) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.
How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between Decode Capital and FAIR MARKETS?
In APAC Capital Brief's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), Decode Capital records an Overall Score of 2.0 (Risk & Licensing: 2.0, Brand: 2.0, Market Influence: 2.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 1.0), compared with FAIR MARKETS at 6.0 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 4.0, Brand: 5.0, Market Influence: 6.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 4.0).
How do Decode Capital and FAIR MARKETS differ in trading platforms and asset classes?
Decode Capital lists CFDs, Indices, Forex, Commodities with execution software [MT4], while FAIR MARKETS lists products, stocks, FX, commodities, oil trading, silver trading, index CFDs with execution software [MT4, MT5]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.
Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: Decode Capital or FAIR MARKETS?
Decode Capital carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while FAIR MARKETS carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).
Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.