Skip to content
APAC Capital Brief
Directory

1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison

DIDIMAX vs Tickmill: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit

Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of DIDIMAX (DIDIMAX) and Tickmill (Tickmill UK Limited) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.

Coverage: Institutions licensed across Asia-Pacific and the Middle East

DIDIMAX 6D Score
6.0
Tickmill 6D Score
7.0
Regulated Licences
1 vs 4
Warning Flags
0 vs 1
DETERMINISTIC QUANTITATIVE VERDICTCanonical Pair: didimax-vs-tickmill

Tickmill outranks DIDIMAX by +1.0 pts in composite 6D scoring (7.0 vs 6.0)

On supervisory breadth, DIDIMAX holds 1 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 1 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas Tickmill holds 4 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 4 total filings and 1 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.

6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison

Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).

Evaluation DimensionMethodology WeightDIDIMAXTickmillScore DeltaDimension Leader
Overall Composite 6D Score100% Composite6.07.0+1.0Tickmill
Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore)30% Weight6.07.0+1.0Tickmill
Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore)20% Weight4.04.00.0Statistical Tie
User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore)20% Weight0.00.00.0Statistical Tie
Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore)15% Weight6.08.0+2.0Tickmill
Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore)15% Weight6.07.0+1.0Tickmill

Visual Architecture Benchmark: DIDIMAX vs Tickmill

Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.

1v1 Institutional Counterparty Benchmark: DIDIMAX vs Tickmill
Exhibit: Side-by-side regulatory and 6D quantitative comparison between DIDIMAX and Tickmill.

Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison

Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.

Audit AttributeDIDIMAXTickmill
Primary Legal NameDIDIMAXTickmill UK Limited
Source Risk ClassificationRisk level not suppliedRisk level not supplied
Active Regulated / Total Filings1 regulated / 1 total (0 Tier-1)4 regulated / 4 total (0 Tier-1)
Recorded Certificate Numbers
Registered Domicile / AddressJalan Garuda No. 88 Bandung Kel. Garuda Kec. Andir, Bandung - Jawa Barat 401843rd Floor, 27 - 32 Old Jewry, London EC2R 8DQ, England
Offered Asset Classes & ServicesFX pairs, commodities, metals, indices and futuresForeign exchange, precious metals, crude oil, stock index
Execution Software & TerminalsMT5MT4, MT5
Supported Client LanguagesIndonesian, EnglishChinese (Simplified), English, Italian, Polish, Malay and languages of other countries or regions
Warning / Exposure Count0 recorded warning(s)1 recorded warning(s)
Specialized Sub-Page Audits

Compare DIDIMAX and Tickmill against other regulated peers in our institutions licensed across asia-pacific and the middle east slice.

Frequently Asked Questions: DIDIMAX vs Tickmill

Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.

Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: DIDIMAX or Tickmill?

Tickmill holds more active regulated filings (4 vs 1). Specifically, DIDIMAX maintains 1 total recorded filing(s) (Commodity Futures Trading Regulatory Agency of Indonesia (BAPPEBTI)) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas Tickmill maintains 4 recorded filing(s) (Financial Conduct Authority, FSCA, CYSEC, Financial Services Authority Seychelles) with 1 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.

How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between DIDIMAX and Tickmill?

In APAC Capital Brief's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), DIDIMAX records an Overall Score of 6.0 (Risk & Licensing: 6.0, Brand: 6.0, Market Influence: 6.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 4.0), compared with Tickmill at 7.0 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 7.0, Brand: 8.0, Market Influence: 7.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 4.0).

How do DIDIMAX and Tickmill differ in trading platforms and asset classes?

DIDIMAX lists FX pairs, commodities, metals, indices and futures with execution software [MT5], while Tickmill lists Foreign exchange, precious metals, crude oil, stock index with execution software [MT4, MT5]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.

Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: DIDIMAX or Tickmill?

DIDIMAX carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while Tickmill carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 1 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).

Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.

DIDIMAX vs Tickmill (2026) — Regulation, 6D Score, Safety & Fee Comparison | APAC Capital Brief