Skip to content
APAC Capital Brief
Directory

1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison

Everbright Securities vs FUBON: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit

Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of Everbright Securities (China Everbright Securities International Company Limited) and FUBON (FUBON SECURITIES (HONG KONG) LIMITED) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.

Coverage: Selected institution records: Asia-Pacific and the Middle East

Everbright Securities 6D Score
6.0
FUBON 6D Score
5.0
Regulated Licences
1 vs 1
Warning Flags
0 vs 0
DETERMINISTIC QUANTITATIVE VERDICTCanonical Pair: everbright-securities-vs-fubon

Everbright Securities outranks FUBON by +1.0 pts in composite 6D scoring (6.0 vs 5.0)

On supervisory breadth, Everbright Securities holds 1 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 1 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas FUBON holds 1 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 1 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.

6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison

Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).

Evaluation DimensionMethodology WeightEverbright SecuritiesFUBONScore DeltaDimension Leader
Overall Composite 6D Score100% Composite6.05.0+1.0Everbright Securities
Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore)30% Weight6.05.0+1.0Everbright Securities
Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore)20% Weight4.03.0+1.0Everbright Securities
User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore)20% Weight0.00.00.0Statistical Tie
Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore)15% Weight5.05.00.0Statistical Tie
Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore)15% Weight5.05.00.0Statistical Tie

Visual Architecture Benchmark: Everbright Securities vs FUBON

Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.

1v1 Institutional Counterparty Benchmark: Everbright Securities vs FUBON
Exhibit: Side-by-side regulatory and 6D quantitative comparison between Everbright Securities and FUBON.

Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison

Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.

Audit AttributeEverbright SecuritiesFUBON
Primary Legal NameChina Everbright Securities International Company LimitedFUBON SECURITIES (HONG KONG) LIMITED
Source Risk ClassificationRisk level not suppliedRisk level not supplied
Active Regulated / Total Filings1 regulated / 1 total (0 Tier-1)1 regulated / 1 total (0 Tier-1)
Recorded Certificate Numbers
Registered Domicile / Address28/F, Lee Garden One, 33 Hysan Avenue, Causeway Bay, Hong KongHK
Offered Asset Classes & ServicesAsset managementSecurities trading and futures business
Execution Software & TerminalsProprietary / Web PlatformProprietary / Web Platform
Supported Client LanguagesChinese (Simplified), Chinese (Traditional), EnglishChinese (Simplified), Chinese (Traditional), English
Warning / Exposure Count0 recorded warning(s)0 recorded warning(s)
Specialized Sub-Page Audits

Compare Everbright Securities and FUBON against other regulated peers in our selected institution records: asia-pacific and the middle east slice.

Frequently Asked Questions: Everbright Securities vs FUBON

Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.

Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: Everbright Securities or FUBON?

Both Everbright Securities and FUBON hold 1 regulated licence record(s) in our dataset. Specifically, Everbright Securities maintains 1 total recorded filing(s) (SFC) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas FUBON maintains 1 recorded filing(s) (SFC) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.

How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between Everbright Securities and FUBON?

In APAC Capital Brief's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), Everbright Securities records an Overall Score of 6.0 (Risk & Licensing: 6.0, Brand: 5.0, Market Influence: 5.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 4.0), compared with FUBON at 5.0 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 5.0, Brand: 5.0, Market Influence: 5.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 3.0).

How do Everbright Securities and FUBON differ in trading platforms and asset classes?

Everbright Securities lists Asset management with execution software [proprietary/web execution], while FUBON lists Securities trading and futures business with execution software [proprietary/web execution]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.

Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: Everbright Securities or FUBON?

Everbright Securities carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while FUBON carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).

Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.

Everbright Securities vs FUBON (2026) — Regulation, 6D Score, Safety & Fee Comparison | APAC Capital Brief