1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison
FAIR MARKETS vs Invast Global: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit
Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of FAIR MARKETS (FairMarkets Trading Pty Ltd) and Invast Global (Invast Financial Services Pty Ltd) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.
Coverage: Selected institution records: Asia-Pacific and the Middle East
- FAIR MARKETS 6D Score
- 6.0
- Invast Global 6D Score
- 6.0
- Regulated Licences
- 1 vs 1
- Warning Flags
- 0 vs 0
FAIR MARKETS and Invast Global are statistically tied in composite 6D scoring (6.0 vs 6.0)
On supervisory breadth, FAIR MARKETS holds 1 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 1 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas Invast Global holds 1 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 1 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.
6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison
Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).
| Evaluation Dimension | Methodology Weight | FAIR MARKETS | Invast Global | Score Delta | Dimension Leader |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Composite 6D Score | 100% Composite | 6.0 | 6.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore) | 30% Weight | 4.0 | 6.0 | +2.0 | Invast Global |
| Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore) | 20% Weight | 4.0 | 3.0 | +1.0 | FAIR MARKETS |
| User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore) | 20% Weight | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore) | 15% Weight | 5.0 | 6.0 | +1.0 | Invast Global |
| Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore) | 15% Weight | 6.0 | 6.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
Visual Architecture Benchmark: FAIR MARKETS vs Invast Global
Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.
Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison
Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.
| Audit Attribute | FAIR MARKETS | Invast Global |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Legal Name | FairMarkets Trading Pty Ltd | Invast Financial Services Pty Ltd |
| Source Risk Classification | Risk level not supplied | Risk level not supplied |
| Active Regulated / Total Filings | 1 regulated / 1 total (0 Tier-1) | 1 regulated / 1 total (0 Tier-1) |
| Recorded Certificate Numbers | ||
| Registered Domicile / Address | Level 26, 1 Bligh St, Sydney NSW 2000, Australia The Cyberati Lounge, Ground Floor, Silicon Avenue 40 Cybercity, 72201 Ebene Republic of Mauritius | Level 27, Aurora Place, 88 Phillip Street, Sydney NSW 2000 KOYO BUILDING, 1-5-6, Higashi-Nihonbashi, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, Japan 103-0004 |
| Offered Asset Classes & Services | products, stocks, FX, commodities, oil trading, silver trading, index CFDs | single-stock and ETF synthetic products, stock-algorithm suite, FX and precious metals, indices and commodities |
| Execution Software & Terminals | MT4, MT5 | MT4, MT5 |
| Supported Client Languages | English, Chinese (Simplified), Chinese (Traditional), Tagalog, Vietnamese, Thai, Hindi | English |
| Warning / Exposure Count | 0 recorded warning(s) | 0 recorded warning(s) |
| Specialized Sub-Page Audits |
Related 1v1 Institutional Comparisons
Compare FAIR MARKETS and Invast Global against other regulated peers in our selected institution records: asia-pacific and the middle east slice.
Frequently Asked Questions: FAIR MARKETS vs Invast Global
Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.
Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: FAIR MARKETS or Invast Global?
Both FAIR MARKETS and Invast Global hold 1 regulated licence record(s) in our dataset. Specifically, FAIR MARKETS maintains 1 total recorded filing(s) (ASIC) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas Invast Global maintains 1 recorded filing(s) (ASIC) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.
How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between FAIR MARKETS and Invast Global?
In APAC Capital Brief's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), FAIR MARKETS records an Overall Score of 6.0 (Risk & Licensing: 4.0, Brand: 5.0, Market Influence: 6.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 4.0), compared with Invast Global at 6.0 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 6.0, Brand: 6.0, Market Influence: 6.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 3.0).
How do FAIR MARKETS and Invast Global differ in trading platforms and asset classes?
FAIR MARKETS lists products, stocks, FX, commodities, oil trading, silver trading, index CFDs with execution software [MT4, MT5], while Invast Global lists single-stock and ETF synthetic products, stock-algorithm suite, FX and precious metals, indices and commodities with execution software [MT4, MT5]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.
Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: FAIR MARKETS or Invast Global?
FAIR MARKETS carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while Invast Global carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).
Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.