Skip to content
APAC Capital Brief
Directory

1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison

FAIR MARKETS vs PFD: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit

Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of FAIR MARKETS (FairMarkets Trading Pty Ltd) and PFD (Pacific Financial Derivatives Ltd) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.

Coverage: Institutions licensed across Asia-Pacific and the Middle East

FAIR MARKETS 6D Score
6.0
PFD 6D Score
6.0
Regulated Licences
1 vs 1
Warning Flags
0 vs 0
DETERMINISTIC QUANTITATIVE VERDICTCanonical Pair: fair-markets-vs-pfd

FAIR MARKETS and PFD are statistically tied in composite 6D scoring (6.0 vs 6.0)

On supervisory breadth, FAIR MARKETS holds 1 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 1 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas PFD holds 1 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 1 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.

6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison

Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).

Evaluation DimensionMethodology WeightFAIR MARKETSPFDScore DeltaDimension Leader
Overall Composite 6D Score100% Composite6.06.00.0Statistical Tie
Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore)30% Weight4.06.0+2.0PFD
Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore)20% Weight4.04.00.0Statistical Tie
User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore)20% Weight0.00.00.0Statistical Tie
Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore)15% Weight5.05.00.0Statistical Tie
Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore)15% Weight6.05.0+1.0FAIR MARKETS

Visual Architecture Benchmark: FAIR MARKETS vs PFD

Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.

1v1 Institutional Counterparty Benchmark: FAIR MARKETS vs PFD
Exhibit: Side-by-side regulatory and 6D quantitative comparison between FAIR MARKETS and PFD.

Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison

Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.

Audit AttributeFAIR MARKETSPFD
Primary Legal NameFairMarkets Trading Pty LtdPacific Financial Derivatives Ltd
Source Risk ClassificationRisk level not suppliedRisk level not supplied
Active Regulated / Total Filings1 regulated / 1 total (0 Tier-1)1 regulated / 1 total (0 Tier-1)
Recorded Certificate Numbers
Registered Domicile / AddressLevel 26, 1 Bligh St, Sydney NSW 2000, Australia The Cyberati Lounge, Ground Floor, Silicon Avenue 40 Cybercity, 72201 Ebene Republic of MauritiusLevel 8, Swanson House,12- 26 Swanson St., Auckland Central 1010, New Zealand
Offered Asset Classes & Servicesproducts, stocks, FX, commodities, oil trading, silver trading, index CFDsMetals, spot crude oil, commodities, CFDs (Contracts for Difference), indices and futures CFD contracts.
Execution Software & TerminalsMT4, MT5MT4
Supported Client LanguagesEnglish, Chinese (Simplified), Chinese (Traditional), Tagalog, Vietnamese, Thai, HindiEnglish
Warning / Exposure Count0 recorded warning(s)0 recorded warning(s)
Specialized Sub-Page Audits

Compare FAIR MARKETS and PFD against other regulated peers in our institutions licensed across asia-pacific and the middle east slice.

Frequently Asked Questions: FAIR MARKETS vs PFD

Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.

Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: FAIR MARKETS or PFD?

Both FAIR MARKETS and PFD hold 1 regulated licence record(s) in our dataset. Specifically, FAIR MARKETS maintains 1 total recorded filing(s) (ASIC) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas PFD maintains 1 recorded filing(s) (FMA) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.

How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between FAIR MARKETS and PFD?

In APAC Capital Brief's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), FAIR MARKETS records an Overall Score of 6.0 (Risk & Licensing: 4.0, Brand: 5.0, Market Influence: 6.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 4.0), compared with PFD at 6.0 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 6.0, Brand: 5.0, Market Influence: 5.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 4.0).

How do FAIR MARKETS and PFD differ in trading platforms and asset classes?

FAIR MARKETS lists products, stocks, FX, commodities, oil trading, silver trading, index CFDs with execution software [MT4, MT5], while PFD lists Metals, spot crude oil, commodities, CFDs (Contracts for Difference), indices and futures CFD contracts. with execution software [MT4]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.

Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: FAIR MARKETS or PFD?

FAIR MARKETS carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while PFD carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).

Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.

FAIR MARKETS vs PFD (2026) — Regulation, 6D Score, Safety & Fee Comparison | APAC Capital Brief