Skip to content
APAC Capital Brief
Directory

1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison

FXTF vs Rakuten Securities: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit

Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of FXTF (Goldenway Japan Co., Ltd.) and Rakuten Securities (Rakuten Securities Australia Pty Ltd) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.

Coverage: Selected institution records: Asia-Pacific and the Middle East

FXTF 6D Score
7.0
Rakuten Securities 6D Score
6.0
Regulated Licences
1 vs 1
Warning Flags
0 vs 0
DETERMINISTIC QUANTITATIVE VERDICTCanonical Pair: fxtf-vs-rakuten-securities

FXTF outranks Rakuten Securities by +1.0 pts in composite 6D scoring (7.0 vs 6.0)

On supervisory breadth, FXTF holds 1 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 1 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas Rakuten Securities holds 1 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 1 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.

6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison

Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).

Evaluation DimensionMethodology WeightFXTFRakuten SecuritiesScore DeltaDimension Leader
Overall Composite 6D Score100% Composite7.06.0+1.0FXTF
Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore)30% Weight7.06.0+1.0FXTF
Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore)20% Weight4.04.00.0Statistical Tie
User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore)20% Weight0.00.00.0Statistical Tie
Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore)15% Weight7.05.0+2.0FXTF
Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore)15% Weight7.05.0+2.0FXTF

Visual Architecture Benchmark: FXTF vs Rakuten Securities

Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.

1v1 Institutional Counterparty Benchmark: FXTF vs Rakuten Securities
Exhibit: Side-by-side regulatory and 6D quantitative comparison between FXTF and Rakuten Securities.

Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison

Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.

Audit AttributeFXTFRakuten Securities
Primary Legal NameGoldenway Japan Co., Ltd.Rakuten Securities Australia Pty Ltd
Source Risk ClassificationRisk level not suppliedRisk level not supplied
Active Regulated / Total Filings1 regulated / 1 total (0 Tier-1)1 regulated / 1 total (0 Tier-1)
Recorded Certificate Numbers
Registered Domicile / Address108-0073 2-11-15 Mita, Minato-ku, East Kyoto 4F, Mita Kawasaki TowerLevel 11, 8 Spring Street Sydney NSW 2000, Australia
Offered Asset Classes & ServicesMargin trading services for currency pairsIndices, Forex, Commodities
Execution Software & TerminalsMT4iSPEED FX, MT4
Supported Client LanguagesJapaneseChinese (Simplified), Chinese (Traditional), English, Other languages
Warning / Exposure Count0 recorded warning(s)0 recorded warning(s)
Specialized Sub-Page Audits

Compare FXTF and Rakuten Securities against other regulated peers in our selected institution records: asia-pacific and the middle east slice.

Frequently Asked Questions: FXTF vs Rakuten Securities

Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.

Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: FXTF or Rakuten Securities?

Both FXTF and Rakuten Securities hold 1 regulated licence record(s) in our dataset. Specifically, FXTF maintains 1 total recorded filing(s) (FSA) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas Rakuten Securities maintains 1 recorded filing(s) (FSA) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.

How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between FXTF and Rakuten Securities?

In APAC Capital Brief's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), FXTF records an Overall Score of 7.0 (Risk & Licensing: 7.0, Brand: 7.0, Market Influence: 7.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 4.0), compared with Rakuten Securities at 6.0 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 6.0, Brand: 5.0, Market Influence: 5.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 4.0).

How do FXTF and Rakuten Securities differ in trading platforms and asset classes?

FXTF lists Margin trading services for currency pairs with execution software [MT4], while Rakuten Securities lists Indices, Forex, Commodities with execution software [iSPEED FX, MT4]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.

Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: FXTF or Rakuten Securities?

FXTF carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while Rakuten Securities carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).

Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.

FXTF vs Rakuten Securities (2026) — Regulation, 6D Score, Safety & Fee Comparison | APAC Capital Brief