1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison
IBF vs Zambesi Gold: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit
Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of IBF (PT. International Business Futures) and Zambesi Gold (Zambesi Gold) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.
Coverage: Selected institution records: Asia-Pacific and the Middle East
- IBF 6D Score
- 1.7
- Zambesi Gold 6D Score
- 2.0
- Regulated Licences
- 0 vs 0
- Warning Flags
- 0 vs 0
Zambesi Gold outranks IBF by +0.3 pts in composite 6D scoring (2.0 vs 1.7)
On supervisory breadth, IBF holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 0 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas Zambesi Gold holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 0 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.
6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison
Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).
| Evaluation Dimension | Methodology Weight | IBF | Zambesi Gold | Score Delta | Dimension Leader |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Composite 6D Score | 100% Composite | 1.7 | 2.0 | +0.3 | Zambesi Gold |
| Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore) | 30% Weight | 1.7 | 2.0 | +0.3 | Zambesi Gold |
| Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore) | 20% Weight | 1.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore) | 20% Weight | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore) | 15% Weight | 1.7 | 2.0 | +0.3 | Zambesi Gold |
| Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore) | 15% Weight | 1.7 | 2.0 | +0.3 | Zambesi Gold |
Visual Architecture Benchmark: IBF vs Zambesi Gold
Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.
Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison
Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.
| Audit Attribute | IBF | Zambesi Gold |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Legal Name | PT. International Business Futures | Zambesi Gold |
| Source Risk Classification | Risk level not supplied | Risk level not supplied |
| Active Regulated / Total Filings | 0 regulated / 0 total (0 Tier-1) | 0 regulated / 0 total (0 Tier-1) |
| Recorded Certificate Numbers | None on file | None on file |
| Registered Domicile / Address | Paskal Hyper Square Blok D No. 45-46, Jl. H.O.S CokroaMinoTo No. 25-27 BandunG 40181 Paskal Hyper Square Blok D No.45-46 Jl. H.O.S Cokroaminoto No.25-27 Bandung, Jawa Barat – 40181 | ZA |
| Offered Asset Classes & Services | Foreign exchange, metals and energy, Asian indices, US indices | Multi-asset financial services |
| Execution Software & Terminals | MT4 | Proprietary / Web Platform |
| Supported Client Languages | Indonesian | English |
| Warning / Exposure Count | 0 recorded warning(s) | 0 recorded warning(s) |
| Specialized Sub-Page Audits |
Related 1v1 Institutional Comparisons
Compare IBF and Zambesi Gold against other regulated peers in our selected institution records: asia-pacific and the middle east slice.
Frequently Asked Questions: IBF vs Zambesi Gold
Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.
Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: IBF or Zambesi Gold?
Both IBF and Zambesi Gold hold 0 regulated licence record(s) in our dataset. Specifically, IBF maintains 0 total recorded filing(s) (none on file) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas Zambesi Gold maintains 0 recorded filing(s) (none on file) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.
How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between IBF and Zambesi Gold?
In APAC Capital Brief's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), IBF records an Overall Score of 1.7 (Risk & Licensing: 1.7, Brand: 1.7, Market Influence: 1.7, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 1.0), compared with Zambesi Gold at 2.0 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 2.0, Brand: 2.0, Market Influence: 2.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 1.0).
How do IBF and Zambesi Gold differ in trading platforms and asset classes?
IBF lists Foreign exchange, metals and energy, Asian indices, US indices with execution software [MT4], while Zambesi Gold lists general financial services with execution software [proprietary/web execution]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.
Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: IBF or Zambesi Gold?
IBF carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while Zambesi Gold carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).
Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.