1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison
IBF vs ZBG Futures: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit
Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of IBF (PT. International Business Futures) and ZBG Futures (ZBG Futures Exchange) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.
Coverage: Selected institution records: Asia-Pacific and the Middle East
- IBF 6D Score
- 1.7
- ZBG Futures 6D Score
- 2.0
- Regulated Licences
- 0 vs 0
- Warning Flags
- 0 vs 0
ZBG Futures outranks IBF by +0.3 pts in composite 6D scoring (2.0 vs 1.7)
On supervisory breadth, IBF holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 0 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas ZBG Futures holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 0 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.
6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison
Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).
| Evaluation Dimension | Methodology Weight | IBF | ZBG Futures | Score Delta | Dimension Leader |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Composite 6D Score | 100% Composite | 1.7 | 2.0 | +0.3 | ZBG Futures |
| Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore) | 30% Weight | 1.7 | 2.0 | +0.3 | ZBG Futures |
| Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore) | 20% Weight | 1.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore) | 20% Weight | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore) | 15% Weight | 1.7 | 2.0 | +0.3 | ZBG Futures |
| Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore) | 15% Weight | 1.7 | 2.0 | +0.3 | ZBG Futures |
Visual Architecture Benchmark: IBF vs ZBG Futures
Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.
Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison
Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.
| Audit Attribute | IBF | ZBG Futures |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Legal Name | PT. International Business Futures | ZBG Futures Exchange |
| Source Risk Classification | Risk level not supplied | Risk level not supplied |
| Active Regulated / Total Filings | 0 regulated / 0 total (0 Tier-1) | 0 regulated / 0 total (0 Tier-1) |
| Recorded Certificate Numbers | None on file | None on file |
| Registered Domicile / Address | Paskal Hyper Square Blok D No. 45-46, Jl. H.O.S CokroaMinoTo No. 25-27 BandunG 40181 Paskal Hyper Square Blok D No.45-46 Jl. H.O.S Cokroaminoto No.25-27 Bandung, Jawa Barat – 40181 | Headquarters – Hong Kong |
| Offered Asset Classes & Services | Foreign exchange, metals and energy, Asian indices, US indices | Multi-asset financial services |
| Execution Software & Terminals | MT4 | Proprietary / Web Platform |
| Supported Client Languages | Indonesian | English |
| Warning / Exposure Count | 0 recorded warning(s) | 0 recorded warning(s) |
| Specialized Sub-Page Audits |
Related 1v1 Institutional Comparisons
Compare IBF and ZBG Futures against other regulated peers in our selected institution records: asia-pacific and the middle east slice.
Frequently Asked Questions: IBF vs ZBG Futures
Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.
Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: IBF or ZBG Futures?
Both IBF and ZBG Futures hold 0 regulated licence record(s) in our dataset. Specifically, IBF maintains 0 total recorded filing(s) (none on file) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas ZBG Futures maintains 0 recorded filing(s) (none on file) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.
How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between IBF and ZBG Futures?
In APAC Capital Brief's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), IBF records an Overall Score of 1.7 (Risk & Licensing: 1.7, Brand: 1.7, Market Influence: 1.7, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 1.0), compared with ZBG Futures at 2.0 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 2.0, Brand: 2.0, Market Influence: 2.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 1.0).
How do IBF and ZBG Futures differ in trading platforms and asset classes?
IBF lists Foreign exchange, metals and energy, Asian indices, US indices with execution software [MT4], while ZBG Futures lists general financial services with execution software [proprietary/web execution]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.
Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: IBF or ZBG Futures?
IBF carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while ZBG Futures carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).
Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.