1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison
JLLA GROUP vs Katana: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit
Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of JLLA GROUP (JLLA HOLDING GROUP LIMITED) and Katana (Sky Mavis) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.
Coverage: Selected institution records: Asia-Pacific and the Middle East
- JLLA GROUP 6D Score
- 1.0
- Katana 6D Score
- 1.0
- Regulated Licences
- 0 vs 0
- Warning Flags
- 0 vs 0
JLLA GROUP and Katana are statistically tied in composite 6D scoring (1.0 vs 1.0)
On supervisory breadth, JLLA GROUP holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 0 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas Katana holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 0 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.
6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison
Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).
| Evaluation Dimension | Methodology Weight | JLLA GROUP | Katana | Score Delta | Dimension Leader |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Composite 6D Score | 100% Composite | 1.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore) | 30% Weight | 1.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore) | 20% Weight | 1.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore) | 20% Weight | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore) | 15% Weight | 1.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore) | 15% Weight | 1.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
Visual Architecture Benchmark: JLLA GROUP vs Katana
Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.
Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison
Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.
| Audit Attribute | JLLA GROUP | Katana |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Legal Name | JLLA HOLDING GROUP LIMITED | Sky Mavis |
| Source Risk Classification | Risk level not supplied | Risk level not supplied |
| Active Regulated / Total Filings | 0 regulated / 0 total (0 Tier-1) | 0 regulated / 0 total (0 Tier-1) |
| Recorded Certificate Numbers | None on file | None on file |
| Registered Domicile / Address | HK | International |
| Offered Asset Classes & Services | Forex | token swaps, token mining |
| Execution Software & Terminals | Proprietary / Web Platform | Proprietary / Web Platform |
| Supported Client Languages | English | English |
| Warning / Exposure Count | 0 recorded warning(s) | 0 recorded warning(s) |
| Specialized Sub-Page Audits |
Related 1v1 Institutional Comparisons
Compare JLLA GROUP and Katana against other regulated peers in our selected institution records: asia-pacific and the middle east slice.
Frequently Asked Questions: JLLA GROUP vs Katana
Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.
Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: JLLA GROUP or Katana?
Both JLLA GROUP and Katana hold 0 regulated licence record(s) in our dataset. Specifically, JLLA GROUP maintains 0 total recorded filing(s) (none on file) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas Katana maintains 0 recorded filing(s) (none on file) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.
How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between JLLA GROUP and Katana?
In APAC Capital Brief's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), JLLA GROUP records an Overall Score of 1.0 (Risk & Licensing: 1.0, Brand: 1.0, Market Influence: 1.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 1.0), compared with Katana at 1.0 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 1.0, Brand: 1.0, Market Influence: 1.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 1.0).
How do JLLA GROUP and Katana differ in trading platforms and asset classes?
JLLA GROUP lists Forex with execution software [proprietary/web execution], while Katana lists token swaps, token mining with execution software [proprietary/web execution]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.
Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: JLLA GROUP or Katana?
JLLA GROUP carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while Katana carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).
Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.