Skip to content
APAC Capital Brief
Directory

1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison

Mahadana vs PGM: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit

Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of Mahadana (PT. Mahadana Asta Berjangka) and PGM (PGM) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.

Coverage: Institutions licensed across Asia-Pacific and the Middle East

Mahadana 6D Score
5.0
PGM 6D Score
6.0
Regulated Licences
1 vs 1
Warning Flags
0 vs 0
DETERMINISTIC QUANTITATIVE VERDICTCanonical Pair: mahadana-vs-pgm

PGM outranks Mahadana by +1.0 pts in composite 6D scoring (6.0 vs 5.0)

On supervisory breadth, Mahadana holds 1 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 1 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas PGM holds 1 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 1 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.

6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison

Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).

Evaluation DimensionMethodology WeightMahadanaPGMScore DeltaDimension Leader
Overall Composite 6D Score100% Composite5.06.0+1.0PGM
Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore)30% Weight5.06.0+1.0PGM
Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore)20% Weight3.03.00.0Statistical Tie
User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore)20% Weight0.00.00.0Statistical Tie
Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore)15% Weight5.06.0+1.0PGM
Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore)15% Weight5.06.0+1.0PGM

Visual Architecture Benchmark: Mahadana vs PGM

Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.

1v1 Institutional Counterparty Benchmark: Mahadana vs PGM
Exhibit: Side-by-side regulatory and 6D quantitative comparison between Mahadana and PGM.

Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison

Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.

Audit AttributeMahadanaPGM
Primary Legal NamePT. Mahadana Asta BerjangkaPGM
Source Risk ClassificationRisk level not suppliedRisk level not supplied
Active Regulated / Total Filings1 regulated / 1 total (0 Tier-1)1 regulated / 1 total (0 Tier-1)
Recorded Certificate Numbers
Registered Domicile / AddressAXA Tower, 32nd & 29th Floor, Jl. Prof. Dr. Satrio Kav. 18, South Jakarta, DKI Jakarta 12940 Graha Aktiva 9th Floor, Jln. HR Rasuna Said, South Jakarta, DKI Jakarta 12950 Jl. Nusa Indah I No.56, Pontianak City, West Kalimantan 78117INP MELBOURNE, Suite 103, 566 St kilda Road MELBOURNE VIC 3004
Offered Asset Classes & ServicesFX, London gold, stock-index futuresFX pairs, indices, commodities and precious metals
Execution Software & TerminalsMT4MT4, MT5
Supported Client LanguagesEnglishEnglish, Chinese, Japanese, Thai, Uyghur
Warning / Exposure Count0 recorded warning(s)0 recorded warning(s)
Specialized Sub-Page Audits

Compare Mahadana and PGM against other regulated peers in our institutions licensed across asia-pacific and the middle east slice.

Frequently Asked Questions: Mahadana vs PGM

Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.

Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: Mahadana or PGM?

Both Mahadana and PGM hold 1 regulated licence record(s) in our dataset. Specifically, Mahadana maintains 1 total recorded filing(s) (Commodity Futures Trading Regulatory Agency of Indonesia (BAPPEBTI)) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas PGM maintains 1 recorded filing(s) (ASIC) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.

How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between Mahadana and PGM?

In APAC Capital Brief's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), Mahadana records an Overall Score of 5.0 (Risk & Licensing: 5.0, Brand: 5.0, Market Influence: 5.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 3.0), compared with PGM at 6.0 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 6.0, Brand: 6.0, Market Influence: 6.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 3.0).

How do Mahadana and PGM differ in trading platforms and asset classes?

Mahadana lists FX, London gold, stock-index futures with execution software [MT4], while PGM lists FX pairs, indices, commodities and precious metals with execution software [MT4, MT5]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.

Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: Mahadana or PGM?

Mahadana carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while PGM carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).

Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.

Mahadana vs PGM (2026) — Regulation, 6D Score, Safety & Fee Comparison | APAC Capital Brief