1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison
Mahadana vs Rupeezy: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit
Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of Mahadana (PT. Mahadana Asta Berjangka) and Rupeezy (Rupeezy) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.
Coverage: Selected institution records: Asia-Pacific and the Middle East
- Mahadana 6D Score
- 5.0
- Rupeezy 6D Score
- 5.0
- Regulated Licences
- 1 vs 1
- Warning Flags
- 0 vs 0
Mahadana and Rupeezy are statistically tied in composite 6D scoring (5.0 vs 5.0)
On supervisory breadth, Mahadana holds 1 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 1 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas Rupeezy holds 1 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 1 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.
6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison
Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).
| Evaluation Dimension | Methodology Weight | Mahadana | Rupeezy | Score Delta | Dimension Leader |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Composite 6D Score | 100% Composite | 5.0 | 5.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore) | 30% Weight | 5.0 | 6.0 | +1.0 | Rupeezy |
| Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore) | 20% Weight | 3.0 | 3.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore) | 20% Weight | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore) | 15% Weight | 5.0 | 5.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore) | 15% Weight | 5.0 | 5.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
Visual Architecture Benchmark: Mahadana vs Rupeezy
Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.
Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison
Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.
| Audit Attribute | Mahadana | Rupeezy |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Legal Name | PT. Mahadana Asta Berjangka | Rupeezy |
| Source Risk Classification | Risk level not supplied | Risk level not supplied |
| Active Regulated / Total Filings | 1 regulated / 1 total (0 Tier-1) | 1 regulated / 1 total (0 Tier-1) |
| Recorded Certificate Numbers | ||
| Registered Domicile / Address | AXA Tower, 32nd & 29th Floor, Jl. Prof. Dr. Satrio Kav. 18, South Jakarta, DKI Jakarta 12940 Graha Aktiva 9th Floor, Jln. HR Rasuna Said, South Jakarta, DKI Jakarta 12950 Jl. Nusa Indah I No.56, Pontianak City, West Kalimantan 78117 | Astha Credit & Securities Pvt Ltd F-01,138/42, Usha Preet, Malviya Nagar, Bhopal (MP) 462003 [email protected] |
| Offered Asset Classes & Services | FX, London gold, stock-index futures | Financial products, stocks, mutual funds, futures and options, IPOs and commodities |
| Execution Software & Terminals | MT4 | Rupeezy Stocks, Options, ETF, Rupeezy, Share Market App |
| Supported Client Languages | English | English |
| Warning / Exposure Count | 0 recorded warning(s) | 0 recorded warning(s) |
| Specialized Sub-Page Audits |
Related 1v1 Institutional Comparisons
Compare Mahadana and Rupeezy against other regulated peers in our selected institution records: asia-pacific and the middle east slice.
Frequently Asked Questions: Mahadana vs Rupeezy
Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.
Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: Mahadana or Rupeezy?
Both Mahadana and Rupeezy hold 1 regulated licence record(s) in our dataset. Specifically, Mahadana maintains 1 total recorded filing(s) (Commodity Futures Trading Regulatory Agency of Indonesia (BAPPEBTI)) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas Rupeezy maintains 1 recorded filing(s) (SEBI) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.
How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between Mahadana and Rupeezy?
In APAC Capital Brief's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), Mahadana records an Overall Score of 5.0 (Risk & Licensing: 5.0, Brand: 5.0, Market Influence: 5.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 3.0), compared with Rupeezy at 5.0 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 6.0, Brand: 5.0, Market Influence: 5.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 3.0).
How do Mahadana and Rupeezy differ in trading platforms and asset classes?
Mahadana lists FX, London gold, stock-index futures with execution software [MT4], while Rupeezy lists Financial products, stocks, mutual funds, futures and options, IPOs and commodities with execution software [Rupeezy Stocks, Options, ETF, Rupeezy, Share Market App]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.
Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: Mahadana or Rupeezy?
Mahadana carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while Rupeezy carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).
Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.