Skip to content
APAC Capital Brief
Directory

1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison

PFD vs Sphynx Labs: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit

Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of PFD (Pacific Financial Derivatives Ltd) and Sphynx Labs (Sphynx Labs Limited) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.

Coverage: Institutions licensed across Asia-Pacific and the Middle East

PFD 6D Score
6.0
Sphynx Labs 6D Score
1.3
Regulated Licences
1 vs 0
Warning Flags
0 vs 0
DETERMINISTIC QUANTITATIVE VERDICTCanonical Pair: pfd-vs-sphynx-labs

PFD outranks Sphynx Labs by +4.7 pts in composite 6D scoring (6.0 vs 1.3)

On supervisory breadth, PFD holds 1 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 1 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas Sphynx Labs holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 0 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.

6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison

Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).

Evaluation DimensionMethodology WeightPFDSphynx LabsScore DeltaDimension Leader
Overall Composite 6D Score100% Composite6.01.3+4.7PFD
Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore)30% Weight6.01.9+4.1PFD
Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore)20% Weight4.01.0+3.0PFD
User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore)20% Weight0.00.00.0Statistical Tie
Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore)15% Weight5.01.8+3.2PFD
Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore)15% Weight5.01.6+3.4PFD

Visual Architecture Benchmark: PFD vs Sphynx Labs

Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.

1v1 Institutional Counterparty Benchmark: PFD vs Sphynx Labs
Exhibit: Side-by-side regulatory and 6D quantitative comparison between PFD and Sphynx Labs.

Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison

Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.

Audit AttributePFDSphynx Labs
Primary Legal NamePacific Financial Derivatives LtdSphynx Labs Limited
Source Risk ClassificationRisk level not suppliedRisk level not supplied
Active Regulated / Total Filings1 regulated / 1 total (0 Tier-1)0 regulated / 0 total (0 Tier-1)
Recorded Certificate NumbersNone on file
Registered Domicile / AddressLevel 8, Swanson House,12- 26 Swanson St., Auckland Central 1010, New Zealand-
Offered Asset Classes & ServicesMetals, spot crude oil, commodities, CFDs (Contracts for Difference), indices and futures CFD contracts.Multi-asset financial services
Execution Software & TerminalsMT4Proprietary / Web Platform
Supported Client LanguagesEnglishEnglish
Warning / Exposure Count0 recorded warning(s)0 recorded warning(s)
Specialized Sub-Page Audits

Compare PFD and Sphynx Labs against other regulated peers in our institutions licensed across asia-pacific and the middle east slice.

Frequently Asked Questions: PFD vs Sphynx Labs

Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.

Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: PFD or Sphynx Labs?

PFD holds more active regulated filings (1 vs 0). Specifically, PFD maintains 1 total recorded filing(s) (FMA) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas Sphynx Labs maintains 0 recorded filing(s) (none on file) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.

How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between PFD and Sphynx Labs?

In APAC Capital Brief's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), PFD records an Overall Score of 6.0 (Risk & Licensing: 6.0, Brand: 5.0, Market Influence: 5.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 4.0), compared with Sphynx Labs at 1.3 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 1.9, Brand: 1.8, Market Influence: 1.6, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 1.0).

How do PFD and Sphynx Labs differ in trading platforms and asset classes?

PFD lists Metals, spot crude oil, commodities, CFDs (Contracts for Difference), indices and futures CFD contracts. with execution software [MT4], while Sphynx Labs lists general financial services with execution software [proprietary/web execution]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.

Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: PFD or Sphynx Labs?

PFD carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while Sphynx Labs carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).

Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.

PFD vs Sphynx Labs (2026) — Regulation, 6D Score, Safety & Fee Comparison | APAC Capital Brief