Skip to content
APAC Capital Brief
Directory

1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison

PGM vs SEVEN WONDERS: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit

Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of PGM (PGM) and SEVEN WONDERS (SEVEN WONDERS INTERNATIONAL LIMITED) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.

Coverage: Selected institution records: Asia-Pacific and the Middle East

PGM 6D Score
6.0
SEVEN WONDERS 6D Score
2.0
Regulated Licences
1 vs 1
Warning Flags
0 vs 0
DETERMINISTIC QUANTITATIVE VERDICTCanonical Pair: pgm-vs-seven-wonders

PGM outranks SEVEN WONDERS by +4.0 pts in composite 6D scoring (6.0 vs 2.0)

On supervisory breadth, PGM holds 1 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 1 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas SEVEN WONDERS holds 1 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 1 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.

6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison

Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).

Evaluation DimensionMethodology WeightPGMSEVEN WONDERSScore DeltaDimension Leader
Overall Composite 6D Score100% Composite6.02.0+4.0PGM
Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore)30% Weight6.02.0+4.0PGM
Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore)20% Weight3.01.0+2.0PGM
User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore)20% Weight0.00.00.0Statistical Tie
Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore)15% Weight6.02.0+4.0PGM
Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore)15% Weight6.02.0+4.0PGM

Visual Architecture Benchmark: PGM vs SEVEN WONDERS

Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.

1v1 Institutional Counterparty Benchmark: PGM vs SEVEN WONDERS
Exhibit: Side-by-side regulatory and 6D quantitative comparison between PGM and SEVEN WONDERS.

Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison

Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.

Audit AttributePGMSEVEN WONDERS
Primary Legal NamePGMSEVEN WONDERS INTERNATIONAL LIMITED
Source Risk ClassificationRisk level not suppliedRisk level not supplied
Active Regulated / Total Filings1 regulated / 1 total (0 Tier-1)1 regulated / 1 total (0 Tier-1)
Recorded Certificate Numbers
Registered Domicile / AddressINP MELBOURNE, Suite 103, 566 St kilda Road MELBOURNE VIC 3004Flat/RM A,20/F Kiu Fu Commercial Bldg,300 Lockhart Road,Wan Chai,Hong Kong Hong Kong, Hong Kong 1010 HK Room 809C , 8/F star house, 3 Salisbury Road, Tsim Sha Tsui. Kowloon HONG KONG 302 116-118 Christie St St Leonards NSW 2065
Offered Asset Classes & ServicesFX pairs, indices, commodities and precious metalsCFDs, Precious metals
Execution Software & TerminalsMT4, MT5MT4
Supported Client LanguagesEnglish, Chinese, Japanese, Thai, UyghurChinese, English
Warning / Exposure Count0 recorded warning(s)0 recorded warning(s)
Specialized Sub-Page Audits

Compare PGM and SEVEN WONDERS against other regulated peers in our selected institution records: asia-pacific and the middle east slice.

Frequently Asked Questions: PGM vs SEVEN WONDERS

Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.

Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: PGM or SEVEN WONDERS?

Both PGM and SEVEN WONDERS hold 1 regulated licence record(s) in our dataset. Specifically, PGM maintains 1 total recorded filing(s) (ASIC) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas SEVEN WONDERS maintains 1 recorded filing(s) (ASIC) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.

How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between PGM and SEVEN WONDERS?

In APAC Capital Brief's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), PGM records an Overall Score of 6.0 (Risk & Licensing: 6.0, Brand: 6.0, Market Influence: 6.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 3.0), compared with SEVEN WONDERS at 2.0 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 2.0, Brand: 2.0, Market Influence: 2.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 1.0).

How do PGM and SEVEN WONDERS differ in trading platforms and asset classes?

PGM lists FX pairs, indices, commodities and precious metals with execution software [MT4, MT5], while SEVEN WONDERS lists CFDs, Precious metals with execution software [MT4]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.

Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: PGM or SEVEN WONDERS?

PGM carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while SEVEN WONDERS carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).

Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.

PGM vs SEVEN WONDERS (2026) — Regulation, 6D Score, Safety & Fee Comparison | APAC Capital Brief