1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison
Razorpay vs RelayPay: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit
Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of Razorpay (Razorpay) and RelayPay (RelayPay) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.
Coverage: Institutions licensed across Asia-Pacific and the Middle East
- Razorpay 6D Score
- 5.0
- RelayPay 6D Score
- 2.0
- Regulated Licences
- 0 vs 1
- Warning Flags
- 0 vs 0
Razorpay outranks RelayPay by +3.0 pts in composite 6D scoring (5.0 vs 2.0)
On supervisory breadth, Razorpay holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 0 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas RelayPay holds 1 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 1 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.
6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison
Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).
| Evaluation Dimension | Methodology Weight | Razorpay | RelayPay | Score Delta | Dimension Leader |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Composite 6D Score | 100% Composite | 5.0 | 2.0 | +3.0 | Razorpay |
| Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore) | 30% Weight | 5.0 | 2.0 | +3.0 | Razorpay |
| Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore) | 20% Weight | 3.0 | 1.0 | +2.0 | Razorpay |
| User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore) | 20% Weight | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore) | 15% Weight | 5.0 | 2.0 | +3.0 | Razorpay |
| Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore) | 15% Weight | 5.0 | 2.0 | +3.0 | Razorpay |
Visual Architecture Benchmark: Razorpay vs RelayPay
Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.
Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison
Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.
| Audit Attribute | Razorpay | RelayPay |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Legal Name | Razorpay | RelayPay |
| Source Risk Classification | Risk level not supplied | Risk level not supplied |
| Active Regulated / Total Filings | 0 regulated / 0 total (0 Tier-1) | 1 regulated / 1 total (0 Tier-1) |
| Recorded Certificate Numbers | None on file | |
| Registered Domicile / Address | Bangalore Headquarters 1st Floor, SJR Cyber, 22, Laskar Hosur Road, Adugodi, Bangalore, Karnataka - 560030 | AU |
| Offered Asset Classes & Services | Payment and banking solutions | Multi-asset financial services |
| Execution Software & Terminals | Proprietary / Web Platform | Proprietary / Web Platform |
| Supported Client Languages | English | English |
| Warning / Exposure Count | 0 recorded warning(s) | 0 recorded warning(s) |
| Specialized Sub-Page Audits |
Related 1v1 Institutional Comparisons
Compare Razorpay and RelayPay against other regulated peers in our institutions licensed across asia-pacific and the middle east slice.
Frequently Asked Questions: Razorpay vs RelayPay
Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.
Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: Razorpay or RelayPay?
RelayPay holds more active regulated filings (1 vs 0). Specifically, Razorpay maintains 0 total recorded filing(s) (none on file) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas RelayPay maintains 1 recorded filing(s) (ASIC) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.
How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between Razorpay and RelayPay?
In APAC Capital Brief's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), Razorpay records an Overall Score of 5.0 (Risk & Licensing: 5.0, Brand: 5.0, Market Influence: 5.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 3.0), compared with RelayPay at 2.0 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 2.0, Brand: 2.0, Market Influence: 2.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 1.0).
How do Razorpay and RelayPay differ in trading platforms and asset classes?
Razorpay lists Payment and banking solutions with execution software [proprietary/web execution], while RelayPay lists general financial services with execution software [proprietary/web execution]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.
Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: Razorpay or RelayPay?
Razorpay carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while RelayPay carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).
Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.
