1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison
Soswap vs ZBG Futures: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit
Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of Soswap (RAI Finance) and ZBG Futures (ZBG Futures Exchange) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.
Coverage: Selected institution records: Asia-Pacific and the Middle East
- Soswap 6D Score
- 1.8
- ZBG Futures 6D Score
- 2.0
- Regulated Licences
- 0 vs 0
- Warning Flags
- 0 vs 0
ZBG Futures outranks Soswap by +0.2 pts in composite 6D scoring (2.0 vs 1.8)
On supervisory breadth, Soswap holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 0 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas ZBG Futures holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 0 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.
6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison
Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).
| Evaluation Dimension | Methodology Weight | Soswap | ZBG Futures | Score Delta | Dimension Leader |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Composite 6D Score | 100% Composite | 1.8 | 2.0 | +0.2 | ZBG Futures |
| Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore) | 30% Weight | 1.8 | 2.0 | +0.2 | ZBG Futures |
| Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore) | 20% Weight | 1.0 | 1.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore) | 20% Weight | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore) | 15% Weight | 1.8 | 2.0 | +0.2 | ZBG Futures |
| Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore) | 15% Weight | 1.8 | 2.0 | +0.2 | ZBG Futures |
Visual Architecture Benchmark: Soswap vs ZBG Futures
Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.
Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison
Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.
| Audit Attribute | Soswap | ZBG Futures |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Legal Name | RAI Finance | ZBG Futures Exchange |
| Source Risk Classification | Risk level not supplied | Risk level not supplied |
| Active Regulated / Total Filings | 0 regulated / 0 total (0 Tier-1) | 0 regulated / 0 total (0 Tier-1) |
| Recorded Certificate Numbers | None on file | None on file |
| Registered Domicile / Address | SG | Headquarters – Hong Kong |
| Offered Asset Classes & Services | decentralised trading, liquidity provision, yield agricultural market | Multi-asset financial services |
| Execution Software & Terminals | Proprietary / Web Platform | Proprietary / Web Platform |
| Supported Client Languages | English | English |
| Warning / Exposure Count | 0 recorded warning(s) | 0 recorded warning(s) |
| Specialized Sub-Page Audits |
Related 1v1 Institutional Comparisons
Compare Soswap and ZBG Futures against other regulated peers in our selected institution records: asia-pacific and the middle east slice.
Frequently Asked Questions: Soswap vs ZBG Futures
Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.
Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: Soswap or ZBG Futures?
Both Soswap and ZBG Futures hold 0 regulated licence record(s) in our dataset. Specifically, Soswap maintains 0 total recorded filing(s) (none on file) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas ZBG Futures maintains 0 recorded filing(s) (none on file) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.
How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between Soswap and ZBG Futures?
In APAC Capital Brief's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), Soswap records an Overall Score of 1.8 (Risk & Licensing: 1.8, Brand: 1.8, Market Influence: 1.8, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 1.0), compared with ZBG Futures at 2.0 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 2.0, Brand: 2.0, Market Influence: 2.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 1.0).
How do Soswap and ZBG Futures differ in trading platforms and asset classes?
Soswap lists decentralised trading, liquidity provision, yield agricultural market with execution software [proprietary/web execution], while ZBG Futures lists general financial services with execution software [proprietary/web execution]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.
Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: Soswap or ZBG Futures?
Soswap carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while ZBG Futures carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).
Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.