Skip to content
APAC Capital Brief
Directory

1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison

Statemind vs TonBit: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit

Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of Statemind (Statemind) and TonBit (TonBit) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.

Coverage: Institutions licensed across Asia-Pacific and the Middle East

Statemind 6D Score
5.0
TonBit 6D Score
5.0
Regulated Licences
0 vs 0
Warning Flags
0 vs 0
DETERMINISTIC QUANTITATIVE VERDICTCanonical Pair: statemind-vs-tonbit

Statemind and TonBit are statistically tied in composite 6D scoring (5.0 vs 5.0)

On supervisory breadth, Statemind holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 0 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas TonBit holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 0 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.

6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison

Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).

Evaluation DimensionMethodology WeightStatemindTonBitScore DeltaDimension Leader
Overall Composite 6D Score100% Composite5.05.00.0Statistical Tie
Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore)30% Weight5.05.00.0Statistical Tie
Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore)20% Weight3.03.00.0Statistical Tie
User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore)20% Weight0.00.00.0Statistical Tie
Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore)15% Weight5.05.00.0Statistical Tie
Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore)15% Weight5.05.00.0Statistical Tie

Visual Architecture Benchmark: Statemind vs TonBit

Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.

1v1 Institutional Counterparty Benchmark: Statemind vs TonBit
Exhibit: Side-by-side regulatory and 6D quantitative comparison between Statemind and TonBit.

Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison

Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.

Audit AttributeStatemindTonBit
Primary Legal NameStatemindTonBit
Source Risk ClassificationRisk level not suppliedRisk level not supplied
Active Regulated / Total Filings0 regulated / 0 total (0 Tier-1)0 regulated / 0 total (0 Tier-1)
Recorded Certificate NumbersNone on fileNone on file
Registered Domicile / Address--CN
Offered Asset Classes & ServicesSmart contract audit, blockchain security assessment, security consulting and trainingSmart contract security audit, security competition (TON CTF), security reporting and analysis, developer support
Execution Software & TerminalsProprietary / Web PlatformProprietary / Web Platform
Supported Client LanguagesEnglishEnglish
Warning / Exposure Count0 recorded warning(s)0 recorded warning(s)
Specialized Sub-Page Audits

Compare Statemind and TonBit against other regulated peers in our institutions licensed across asia-pacific and the middle east slice.

Frequently Asked Questions: Statemind vs TonBit

Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.

Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: Statemind or TonBit?

Both Statemind and TonBit hold 0 regulated licence record(s) in our dataset. Specifically, Statemind maintains 0 total recorded filing(s) (none on file) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas TonBit maintains 0 recorded filing(s) (none on file) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.

How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between Statemind and TonBit?

In APAC Capital Brief's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), Statemind records an Overall Score of 5.0 (Risk & Licensing: 5.0, Brand: 5.0, Market Influence: 5.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 3.0), compared with TonBit at 5.0 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 5.0, Brand: 5.0, Market Influence: 5.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 3.0).

How do Statemind and TonBit differ in trading platforms and asset classes?

Statemind lists Smart contract audit, blockchain security assessment, security consulting and training with execution software [proprietary/web execution], while TonBit lists Smart contract security audit, security competition (TON CTF), security reporting and analysis, developer support with execution software [proprietary/web execution]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.

Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: Statemind or TonBit?

Statemind carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while TonBit carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).

Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.

Statemind vs TonBit (2026) — Regulation, 6D Score, Safety & Fee Comparison | APAC Capital Brief