Skip to content
APAC Capital Brief
Directory

1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison

STK vs Tomb Swap: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit

Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of STK (STK LIMITED) and Tomb Swap (Tomb Swap) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.

Coverage: Selected institution records: Asia-Pacific and the Middle East

STK 6D Score
2.0
Tomb Swap 6D Score
2.0
Regulated Licences
0 vs 0
Warning Flags
0 vs 0
DETERMINISTIC QUANTITATIVE VERDICTCanonical Pair: stk-vs-tomb-swap

STK and Tomb Swap are statistically tied in composite 6D scoring (2.0 vs 2.0)

On supervisory breadth, STK holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 0 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas Tomb Swap holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 0 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.

6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison

Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).

Evaluation DimensionMethodology WeightSTKTomb SwapScore DeltaDimension Leader
Overall Composite 6D Score100% Composite2.02.00.0Statistical Tie
Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore)30% Weight2.02.00.0Statistical Tie
Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore)20% Weight1.01.00.0Statistical Tie
User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore)20% Weight0.00.00.0Statistical Tie
Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore)15% Weight2.02.00.0Statistical Tie
Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore)15% Weight2.02.00.0Statistical Tie

Visual Architecture Benchmark: STK vs Tomb Swap

Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.

1v1 Institutional Counterparty Benchmark: STK vs Tomb Swap
Exhibit: Side-by-side regulatory and 6D quantitative comparison between STK and Tomb Swap.

Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison

Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.

Audit AttributeSTKTomb Swap
Primary Legal NameSTK LIMITEDTomb Swap
Source Risk ClassificationRisk level not suppliedRisk level not supplied
Active Regulated / Total Filings0 regulated / 0 total (0 Tier-1)0 regulated / 0 total (0 Tier-1)
Recorded Certificate NumbersNone on fileNone on file
Registered Domicile / AddressRooms 1318-19,Hollywood Plaza,610 Nathan Road,Mongkok,Kowloon,Hong Kong. & 2614870. No. 1601, 16th Floor, Unit 2, Building C2, Rongke Zhigu, 555 Wenhua Avenue, Hongshan District, Wuhan, Hubei Province.SG
Offered Asset Classes & ServicesForex, Commoditiestoken swaps, liquidity provision, yield mining, governance mechanisms
Execution Software & TerminalsProprietary / Web PlatformProprietary / Web Platform
Supported Client LanguagesEnglishEnglish
Warning / Exposure Count0 recorded warning(s)0 recorded warning(s)
Specialized Sub-Page Audits

Compare STK and Tomb Swap against other regulated peers in our selected institution records: asia-pacific and the middle east slice.

Frequently Asked Questions: STK vs Tomb Swap

Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.

Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: STK or Tomb Swap?

Both STK and Tomb Swap hold 0 regulated licence record(s) in our dataset. Specifically, STK maintains 0 total recorded filing(s) (none on file) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas Tomb Swap maintains 0 recorded filing(s) (none on file) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.

How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between STK and Tomb Swap?

In APAC Capital Brief's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), STK records an Overall Score of 2.0 (Risk & Licensing: 2.0, Brand: 2.0, Market Influence: 2.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 1.0), compared with Tomb Swap at 2.0 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 2.0, Brand: 2.0, Market Influence: 2.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 1.0).

How do STK and Tomb Swap differ in trading platforms and asset classes?

STK lists Forex, Commodities with execution software [proprietary/web execution], while Tomb Swap lists token swaps, liquidity provision, yield mining, governance mechanisms with execution software [proprietary/web execution]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.

Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: STK or Tomb Swap?

STK carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while Tomb Swap carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).

Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.

STK vs Tomb Swap (2026) — Regulation, 6D Score, Safety & Fee Comparison | APAC Capital Brief