1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison
Hai Cloud Exchange vs MIC: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit
Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of Hai Cloud Exchange (Hai Cloud Exchange) and MIC (Mactor International) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.
Coverage: Selected institution records: Asia-Pacific and the Middle East
- Hai Cloud Exchange 6D Score
- 5.0
- MIC 6D Score
- 1.0
- Regulated Licences
- 1 vs 0
- Warning Flags
- 0 vs 0
Hai Cloud Exchange outranks MIC by +4.0 pts in composite 6D scoring (5.0 vs 1.0)
On supervisory breadth, Hai Cloud Exchange holds 1 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 1 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas MIC holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 0 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.
6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison
Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).
| Evaluation Dimension | Methodology Weight | Hai Cloud Exchange | MIC | Score Delta | Dimension Leader |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Composite 6D Score | 100% Composite | 5.0 | 1.0 | +4.0 | Hai Cloud Exchange |
| Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore) | 30% Weight | 6.0 | 1.0 | +5.0 | Hai Cloud Exchange |
| Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore) | 20% Weight | 4.0 | 1.0 | +3.0 | Hai Cloud Exchange |
| User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore) | 20% Weight | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore) | 15% Weight | 5.0 | 1.0 | +4.0 | Hai Cloud Exchange |
| Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore) | 15% Weight | 6.0 | 1.0 | +5.0 | Hai Cloud Exchange |
Visual Architecture Benchmark: Hai Cloud Exchange vs MIC
Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.
Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison
Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.
| Audit Attribute | Hai Cloud Exchange | MIC |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Legal Name | Hai Cloud Exchange | Mactor International |
| Source Risk Classification | Risk level not supplied | Risk level not supplied |
| Active Regulated / Total Filings | 1 regulated / 1 total (0 Tier-1) | 0 regulated / 0 total (0 Tier-1) |
| Recorded Certificate Numbers | None on file | |
| Registered Domicile / Address | Room 1901, 19/F The Sun’s Group Centre, No. 200 Gloucester Road, Wanchai, Hong Kong SAR, China | HK |
| Offered Asset Classes & Services | Foreign exchange, spot, forwards, swaps, options and structured products | Forex |
| Execution Software & Terminals | Proprietary / Web Platform | Proprietary / Web Platform |
| Supported Client Languages | Chinese, English | English |
| Warning / Exposure Count | 0 recorded warning(s) | 0 recorded warning(s) |
| Specialized Sub-Page Audits |
Related 1v1 Institutional Comparisons
Compare Hai Cloud Exchange and MIC against other regulated peers in our selected institution records: asia-pacific and the middle east slice.
Frequently Asked Questions: Hai Cloud Exchange vs MIC
Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.
Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: Hai Cloud Exchange or MIC?
Hai Cloud Exchange holds more active regulated filings (1 vs 0). Specifically, Hai Cloud Exchange maintains 1 total recorded filing(s) (SFC) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas MIC maintains 0 recorded filing(s) (none on file) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.
How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between Hai Cloud Exchange and MIC?
In APAC Capital Brief's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), Hai Cloud Exchange records an Overall Score of 5.0 (Risk & Licensing: 6.0, Brand: 5.0, Market Influence: 6.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 4.0), compared with MIC at 1.0 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 1.0, Brand: 1.0, Market Influence: 1.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 1.0).
How do Hai Cloud Exchange and MIC differ in trading platforms and asset classes?
Hai Cloud Exchange lists Foreign exchange, spot, forwards, swaps, options and structured products with execution software [proprietary/web execution], while MIC lists Forex with execution software [proprietary/web execution]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.
Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: Hai Cloud Exchange or MIC?
Hai Cloud Exchange carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while MIC carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).
Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.