1v1 Institutional Counterparty Comparison
Hashlock vs Rakuten Securities: Regulation, 6D Ratings & Safety Audit
Deterministic head-to-head benchmarking of Hashlock (Hashlock) and Rakuten Securities (Rakuten Securities Australia Pty Ltd) across primary regulatory filings, statutory Tier-1 authorisations, 6-Dimension compliance scores, execution software, and warning exposure.
Coverage: Selected institution records: Asia-Pacific and the Middle East
- Hashlock 6D Score
- 5.0
- Rakuten Securities 6D Score
- 6.0
- Regulated Licences
- 0 vs 1
- Warning Flags
- 0 vs 0
Rakuten Securities outranks Hashlock by +1.0 pts in composite 6D scoring (6.0 vs 5.0)
On supervisory breadth, Hashlock holds 0 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 0 total filings and 0 warning count(s), whereas Rakuten Securities holds 1 active regulated licence(s) (0 Tier-1) out of 1 total filings and 0 warning count(s). Allocators should inspect the individual licence numbers and contracting legal entities below before onboarding.
6-Dimension Quantitative Scorecard Comparison
Head-to-head breakdown across all 6 proprietary evaluation dimensions (0.0–10.0 scale).
| Evaluation Dimension | Methodology Weight | Hashlock | Rakuten Securities | Score Delta | Dimension Leader |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Composite 6D Score | 100% Composite | 5.0 | 6.0 | +1.0 | Rakuten Securities |
| Regulatory & Licensing Integrity (riskScore) | 30% Weight | 5.0 | 6.0 | +1.0 | Rakuten Securities |
| Execution & Software Infrastructure (industryScore) | 20% Weight | 3.0 | 4.0 | +1.0 | Rakuten Securities |
| User Reputation & Complaint Telemetry (userScore) | 20% Weight | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Institutional Brand Longevity (brandScore) | 15% Weight | 5.0 | 5.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
| Global Market Influence & Footprint (influenceScore) | 15% Weight | 5.0 | 5.0 | 0.0 | Statistical Tie |
Visual Architecture Benchmark: Hashlock vs Rakuten Securities
Vector comparison exhibit generated from live supervisory snapshot metrics.
Regulatory Standing, Entity & Platform Comparison
Structural comparison of supervisory authorisations, domicile, execution terminals, and risk telemetry.
| Audit Attribute | Hashlock | Rakuten Securities |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Legal Name | Hashlock | Rakuten Securities Australia Pty Ltd |
| Source Risk Classification | Risk level not supplied | Risk level not supplied |
| Active Regulated / Total Filings | 0 regulated / 0 total (0 Tier-1) | 1 regulated / 1 total (0 Tier-1) |
| Recorded Certificate Numbers | None on file | |
| Registered Domicile / Address | U305, 215-217 Pacific highway AU,NSW,Sydney,2290 | Level 11, 8 Spring Street Sydney NSW 2000, Australia |
| Offered Asset Classes & Services | Security audit and consulting services | Indices, Forex, Commodities |
| Execution Software & Terminals | Proprietary / Web Platform | iSPEED FX, MT4 |
| Supported Client Languages | English | Chinese (Simplified), Chinese (Traditional), English, Other languages |
| Warning / Exposure Count | 0 recorded warning(s) | 0 recorded warning(s) |
| Specialized Sub-Page Audits |
Related 1v1 Institutional Comparisons
Compare Hashlock and Rakuten Securities against other regulated peers in our selected institution records: asia-pacific and the middle east slice.
Frequently Asked Questions: Hashlock vs Rakuten Securities
Deterministic counterparty comparison answers derived from supervisory records.
Which institution has stronger regulatory oversight: Hashlock or Rakuten Securities?
Rakuten Securities holds more active regulated filings (1 vs 0). Specifically, Hashlock maintains 0 total recorded filing(s) (none on file) with 0 warning flag(s), whereas Rakuten Securities maintains 1 recorded filing(s) (FSA) with 0 warning flag(s). Always confirm the specific subsidiary onboarding your account on the official regulator register.
How do the 6D quantitative compliance scores compare between Hashlock and Rakuten Securities?
In APAC Capital Brief's 6-Dimension scoring matrix (0.0–10.0 scale), Hashlock records an Overall Score of 5.0 (Risk & Licensing: 5.0, Brand: 5.0, Market Influence: 5.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 3.0), compared with Rakuten Securities at 6.0 Overall (Risk & Licensing: 6.0, Brand: 5.0, Market Influence: 5.0, User Reputation: 0.0, Execution & Software: 4.0).
How do Hashlock and Rakuten Securities differ in trading platforms and asset classes?
Hashlock lists Security audit and consulting services with execution software [proprietary/web execution], while Rakuten Securities lists Indices, Forex, Commodities with execution software [iSPEED FX, MT4]. Counterparties should verify FIX/API connectivity, server routing topology, and negative balance protection per entity.
Which counterparty carries lower regulatory warning and complaint exposure: Hashlock or Rakuten Securities?
Hashlock carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s), while Rakuten Securities carries a "Risk level not supplied" classification with 0 warning/exposure count(s) and 0 user comment(s).
Structured against supervisory register snapshots and public regulatory filings. Verify your contracting legal entity and current authorisation status directly on the issuing regulator’s official register before transacting.